Subject: [PATCH/RFC 03/19] ARM: shmobile: gose: add i2c2 bus to device tree

From: [email-masked] (Sergei Shtylyov)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:03:21 +0300

On 12/14/2015 05:11 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>> Activate i2c2 bus in r8a7793/gose device tree.
>>>
>>> Based on similar work for the r8a7791/koelsch by Wolfram Sang.
>>>
>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <[email-masked]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts
>>> index 3e3122490650..9a71ff6d4474 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts
>> [...]
>>> @@ -135,3 +140,17 @@
>>>   		};
>>>   	};
>>>   };
>>> +
>>> +&i2c2 {
>>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c2_pins>;
>>> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +
>>> +	status = "okay";
>>> +	clock-frequency = <100000>;
>>> +
>>> +	eeprom at 50 {
>>> +		compatible = "renesas,24c02";
>>
>>     This is not a valid value -- the Renesas chip model is different from 24c02.
>
> I copied this value from r8a7791.dtsi.

    r8a7791-koelsch.dts, you mean? I remember there has been a discussion on 
this topic, and I then refrained from adding MAC address EEPROMs as a result. :-)

> Looking at the schematic for gose (v100), koelsch (rev024) and porter (v300)
> I see the following "R1EX24002ATAS0G#U0". Shall we update r8a7791 and
> this patch to "renesas,24002" or leave things as is?

    What Geert has suggested seems the right thing to me.

MBR, Sergei