From: huawei.libin@huawei•com (Li Bin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] livepatch: arm64: add support for livepatch on arm64
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:04:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5670FEF1.1040104@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215154356.GF3729@pathway.suse.cz>
on 2015/12/15 23:43, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2015-12-14 20:49:35, Li Bin wrote:
>> This patchset depends on the on-going gcc feature "-fprolog-pad=N",
>> which will generate a pad of N nops at the beginning of each function.
>>
>> Livepatch on arm64 can using the feature (that always placing one nop
>> at the beginning of the function). And when enable/disable func patching,
>> just modify the pad code to nop or branch. And that NOP and B instruction
>> are both safe instructions on arm64 which called "concurrent modification
>> and execution of instructions", that can be executed by one thread of
>> execution as they are being modified by another thread of execution without
>> requiring explicit synchronization.
>>
>> And this method will improve performance significantly compared with the
>> method based on ftrace, especially for the critical function being frequently
>> called.
> It sounds like a great feature for ftrace. If the new prologue is usable
> for LivePatching, it should be usable to call the ftrace handler as
> well. If you teach ftrace to use the new prologue, you will not need
> all these crazy arch-specific hacks for LivePatching. Then both ftrace
> and livepatch will benefit from the feature.
>
> I suggest to read the ftrace documentation in Documentation/trace/,
> especially ftrace-design.txt. I have never ported ftrace to a new
> architecture. I guess that you need to teach scripts/recordmcount.c
> to find the new location. Also you might need to update
> arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c. Also please make sure that ftrace
> supports DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS on Arm.
Hi Petr,
I had posted one method for livepatch implementaion on arm64 based on ftrace with
DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS.
https://lwn.net/Articles/646317/
This requires GCC changes to support it, and I propose a method that implement -mfentry
feature which following some other arch such as x86/mips/s390 etc. This method is
architecture-specific, and Maxim Kuvyrkov propose a new method for gcc that implement
a target-independent option -fprolog-pad=N, which will generate a pad of N nops at the
beginning of each function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-05/msg00267.html
And based on this, DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS feature can be implemented as
mentioned in:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-November/386815.html
And in this patchset, I only concern the performance for livepatch on arm64, and I
hope this also can be resolved by improving ftrace, and thanks to Steve that he pointed
that he is working on a way to make ftrace a bit better for livepatch.
Thanks,
Li Bin
> It is harder but the right way to go. Your current patch set
> looks like a hack.
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-14 12:49 [RFC PATCH 0/3] livepatch: arm64: add support for livepatch on arm64 Li Bin
2015-12-14 12:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] livepatch: allow arch specific implementation Li Bin
2015-12-14 12:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] livepatch: module: arm64: extract the relocation code for reuse Li Bin
2015-12-14 15:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-12-14 12:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] livepatch: arm64: add support for livepatch on arm64 Li Bin
2015-12-14 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] " Josh Poimboeuf
2015-12-15 15:43 ` Petr Mladek
2015-12-16 6:04 ` Li Bin [this message]
2015-12-17 12:36 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5670FEF1.1040104@huawei.com \
--to=huawei.libin@huawei$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox