From: m.smarduch@samsung•com (Mario Smarduch)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce armv7 fp/simd vcpu fields and helpers
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:28:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568C1952.3050002@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105150040.GF28354@cbox>
On 1/5/2016 7:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 01:54:55PM -0800, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>> Add helper functions to enable access to fp/smid on guest entry and save host
>> fpexc on vcpu put, check if fp/simd registers are dirty and add new vcpu
>> fields.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch@samsung•com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 8 +++++++
>> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> index 3095df0..d4d9da1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>> #include <asm/kvm_mmio.h>
>> #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>> #include <asm/cputype.h>
>> +#include <asm/vfp.h>
>> +#include "../vfp/vfpinstr.h"
>
> this looks dodgy...
>
> can you move vfpinstr.h instead?
Sure I'll fix it up, it's in couple other places in kernel and kvm
- copied it.
>
>>
>> unsigned long *vcpu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num);
>> unsigned long *vcpu_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> @@ -255,4 +257,44 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VFPv3
>> +/* Called from vcpu_load - save fpexc and enable guest access to fp/simd unit */
>
> the comment is misleading, you're not enabling guest access to the
> fp/simd unit, you're just setting the enabled bit to ensure guest
> accesses trap.
That's more accurate.
>
>> +static inline void vcpu_trap_vfp_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + u32 fpexc;
>> +
>> + /* Save host fpexc, and enable guest access to fp unit */
>> + fpexc = fmrx(FPEXC);
>> + vcpu->arch.host_fpexc = fpexc;
>> + fpexc |= FPEXC_EN;
>> + fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc);
>> +
>> + /* Configure HCPTR to trap on tracing and fp/simd access */
>> + vcpu->arch.hcptr = HCPTR_TTA | HCPTR_TCP(10) | HCPTR_TCP(11);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Called from vcpu_put - restore host fpexc */
>
> I would probably get rid of the "Called from" stuff and just describe
> what these functions do locally. Comments like this are likely to be
> out of date soon'ish.
Yeah true, will do.
>
>> +static inline void vcpu_restore_host_fpexc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + fmxr(FPEXC, vcpu->arch.host_fpexc);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* If trap bits are reset then fp/simd registers are dirty */
>> +static inline bool vcpu_vfp_isdirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + return !(vcpu->arch.hcptr & (HCPTR_TCP(10) | HCPTR_TCP(11)));
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void vcpu_trap_vfp_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + vcpu->arch.hcptr = HCPTR_TTA;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void vcpu_restore_host_fpexc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> +static inline bool vcpu_vfp_isdirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> this kind of feels like it belongs in its own C-file instead of a header
> file, perhaps arch/arm/kvm/vfp.C.
>
> Marc, what do you think?
>
That would be starting from vcpu_trap_vfp_enable()? The file is getting
little overloaded.
I'm also thinking that 3rd patch should have one function call for vcpu_put
like vcpu_load does instead of exposing arm32/arm64, arm32 only relevant logic.
When you have a chance to review that patch please keep that in mind.
>> +
>> #endif /* __ARM_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index f9f2779..d3ef58a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -105,6 +105,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>> /* HYP trapping configuration */
>> u32 hcr;
>>
>> + /* HYP Co-processor fp/simd and trace trapping configuration */
>> + u32 hcptr;
>> +
>> + /* Save host FPEXC register to later restore on vcpu put */
>> + u32 host_fpexc;
>> +
>> /* Interrupt related fields */
>> u32 irq_lines; /* IRQ and FIQ levels */
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> index 3066328..ffe8ccf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> @@ -299,4 +299,12 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> return data; /* Leave LE untouched */
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void vcpu_trap_vfp_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> +static inline void vcpu_restore_host_fpexc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> +
>> +static inline bool vcpu_vfp_isdirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-26 21:54 [PATCH v6 0/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Enhance armv7/8 fp/simd lazy switch Mario Smarduch
2015-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce armv7 fp/simd vcpu fields and helpers Mario Smarduch
2016-01-05 15:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-01-05 19:28 ` Mario Smarduch [this message]
2016-01-10 16:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-01-11 23:17 ` Mario Smarduch
2016-01-10 16:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-01-11 23:39 ` Mario Smarduch
2016-01-12 14:12 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-01-13 0:57 ` Mario Smarduch
2016-01-14 3:03 ` Mario Smarduch
2016-01-14 13:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-01-14 13:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-15 2:02 ` Mario Smarduch
2016-01-15 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-16 1:21 ` Mario Smarduch
2016-01-21 2:29 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] arm: KVM: Introduce host fp/simd context switch function Mario Smarduch
2016-01-10 16:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Enable armv7 fp/simd enhanced context switch Mario Smarduch
2016-01-10 16:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] arm: KVM: Delete unused macros Mario Smarduch
2016-01-10 16:32 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568C1952.3050002@samsung.com \
--to=m.smarduch@samsung$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox