From: qiuxishi@huawei•com (Xishi Qiu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Have any influence on set_memory_** about below patch ??
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:35:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56979621.1060102@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160113111806.GC23370@leverpostej>
On 2016/1/13 19:18, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:30:06PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> If I create swapper page tables by 4kb, not large page, then I use
>> set_memory_ro() to change the pate table flag, does it have the problem
>> too?
>
> The splitting/merging problem would not apply.
>
> However, you're going to waste a reasonable amount of memory by not
> using section mappings in the swapper, and we gain additional complexity
> in the page table setup code (which is shared with others things that
> want section mappings).
>
> What are you exactly actually trying to achieve?
>
If module allocates some pages and save data on them, and the data will
not be changed during the module running. So we want to use set_memory_ro()
to increase the security. If the data is changed, we can catch someone.
> What memory do you want to mark RO, and why?
>
The key data, and it will not be changed during the running time.
>>From a previous discussion [1], we figured out alternative approaches
> for common cases. Do none of those work for your case?
>
I have not read the patchset carefully, could you tell me the general meaning
of the approaches?
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/397320.html
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5693A740.7070408@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20160111133145.GM6499@leverpostej>
2016-01-12 1:20 ` Have any influence on set_memory_** about below patch ?? Xishi Qiu
2016-01-12 11:15 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-13 4:10 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-13 11:22 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-13 5:02 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-13 6:35 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-13 11:28 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-27 1:18 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-27 11:25 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-26 14:05 ` zhong jiang
2016-01-26 16:07 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-13 10:30 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-13 11:18 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-14 12:35 ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2016-01-14 13:06 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-14 13:44 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56979621.1060102@huawei.com \
--to=qiuxishi@huawei$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox