Subject: [PATCH v11 3/4] ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in amd-seattle-soc.dtsi

From: [email-masked] (Suravee Suthikulpanit)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:56:16 +0700

Hi Fu Wei,

On 2/10/16 00:00, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei <[email-masked]>
>
> This can be a example of adding SBSA Generic Watchdog device node
> into some dts files for the Soc which contains SBSA Generic Watchdog.
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <[email-masked]>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
> index 2874d92..67eb636 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
> @@ -84,6 +84,15 @@
>   			clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
>   		};
>
> +		watchdog0: watchdog at e0bb0000 {
> +			compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt";
> +			reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>,
> +				<0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>;
> +			interrupts = <0 337 4>;
> +			timeout-sec = <15>;
> +			status = "disabled";

Could you please remove this status line? I do not think it is necessary 
for this one here anymore.

Thanks,
Suravee

> +		};
> +
>   		spi0: ssp at e1020000 {
>   			status = "disabled";
>   			compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";
>