From: aryabinin@virtuozzo•com (Andrey Ryabinin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5sub1 7/8] arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:28:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1E072.2090909@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160212160652.GL31665@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 02/12/2016 07:06 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 03:38:46PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> On 12/02/16 15:26, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 04:17:09PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>> On 12 February 2016 at 16:10, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 04:02:58PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>>> On 12 February 2016 at 15:58, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>>>>> This moves the module area to right before the vmalloc area, and
>>>>>>>> moves the kernel image to the base of the vmalloc area. This is
>>>>>>>> an intermediate step towards implementing KASLR, which allows the
>>>>>>>> kernel image to be located anywhere in the vmalloc area.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro•org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch is causing lots of KASAN warnings on Juno (interestingly, it
>>>>>>> doesn't seem to trigger on Seattle, though we only tried for-next/core).
>>>>>>> I pushed the branch that I'm currently using here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux for-next/kernmap
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A typical error (though its place varies based on the config options,
>>>>>>> kernel layout):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in clockevents_program_event+0x28/0x1b0 at addr ffffffc936257cc8
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you confirm that these are stack accesses? I was having similar
>>>>>> errors before, and I ended up creating the kasan zero page patch
>>>>>> because it turned out the kasan shadow page in question was aliased
>>>>>> and the stack writes were occurring elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's possible, we are looking into this. Is there any other patch I miss on
>>>>> the above branch?
>>>>
>>>> I don't think so but I will check
>>>
>>> Commit 7b1af9795773 ("arm64: kasan: ensure that the KASAN zero page is
>>> mapped read-only") was merged in -rc2 while the branch above is based on
>>> -rc1. Anyway, I merged it into -rc2 and the errors are similar.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry to add more confusion, but I observed similar KASAN warning
>> with latest mainline(v4.5-rc3+, commit c05235d50f68) with below diff.
>
> I can reproduce this with UBSAN enabled (log below for the record).
>
> So far, we have:
>
> KASAN+for-next/kernmap goes wrong
> KASAN+UBSAN goes wrong
>
> Enabled individually, KASAN, UBSAN and for-next/kernmap seem fine. I may
> have to trim for-next/core down until we figure out where the problem
> is.
>
>
> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in find_busiest_group+0x164/0x16a0 at addr ffffffc93665bc8c
Can it be related to TLB conflicts, which supposed to be fixed in "arm64: kasan: avoid TLB conflicts" patch
from "arm64: mm: rework page table creation" series ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 10:54 [PATCH v5sub1 0/8] arm64: split linear and kernel mappings Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 1/8] of/fdt: make memblock minimum physical address arch configurable Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 2/8] arm64: add support for ioremap() block mappings Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 14:10 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-01 14:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 3/8] arm64: introduce KIMAGE_VADDR as the virtual base of the kernel region Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 4/8] arm64: pgtable: implement static [pte|pmd|pud]_offset variants Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 5/8] arm64: decouple early fixmap init from linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 6/8] arm64: kvm: deal with kernel symbols outside of " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 7/8] arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 12:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 12:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 13:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-12 14:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 15:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-12 15:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 15:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-12 15:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 15:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-12 16:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 16:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 14:28 ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2016-02-15 14:35 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-15 18:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-16 12:59 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-16 14:12 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-16 14:29 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-16 15:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-16 15:36 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-16 16:42 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 9:15 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-17 10:10 ` James Morse
2016-02-17 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-17 10:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-17 10:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-17 10:48 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 14:39 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 16:31 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-17 19:35 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 17:01 ` KASAN issues with idle / hotplug area (was: Re: [PATCH v5sub1 7/8] arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area) Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 17:56 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 19:16 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18 8:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-18 8:22 ` KASAN issues with idle / hotplug area Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 8:42 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 9:38 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 11:34 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18 9:39 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-18 11:38 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18 11:45 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 11:15 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18 11:46 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 12:08 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-12 17:47 ` [PATCH v5sub1 7/8] arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area James Morse
2016-02-12 18:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 8/8] arm64: allow kernel Image to be loaded anywhere in physical memory Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 14:50 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-01 16:28 ` Fu Wei
2016-02-16 8:55 ` Fu Wei
2016-02-01 15:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 15:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 16:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 17:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 17:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 18:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 18:30 ` [PATCH] arm64: move back to generic memblock_enforce_memory_limit() Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-02 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-02 10:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-02 10:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 19:45 ` [PATCH v5sub1 0/8] arm64: split linear and kernel mappings Matthias Brugger
2016-02-12 19:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-12 20:10 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-02-12 20:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-13 14:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 13:29 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-02-15 13:40 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 14:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C1E072.2090909@virtuozzo.com \
--to=aryabinin@virtuozzo$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox