Subject: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

From: [email-masked] (Javier Martinez Canillas)
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:30:17 -0300

Hello Eduardo,

On 03/08/2016 06:07 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
>> is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
>> optional properties section and move the regulator property there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> index faa62059b5c5..70b4c16c7ed8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> @@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
>>  		for current TMU channel
>>  	-- "tmu_sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
>>  		channel
>> -- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
>> -		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
>> -		board/platform specific dts file.
>>  
>>  The Exynos TMU supports generating interrupts when reaching given
>>  temperature thresholds. Number of supported thermal trip points depends
> 
> Where is this patch based on? I checked it on my fixes and linus
> branches, also on linux-next 0308 branch, and none of those apply clean.
>

I mentioned in the cover letter [0] that this series were based on top
of in-flight patches from Krzysztof Kozlowski to avoid merge conflicts.

Those have not landed yet either so maybe you could look at those first?
 
> Can you please send this based on upstream kernel?
>

Ok, my intention was to make picking both patch series easier but if
this is inconvenient to you, I can base on top of current mainline
and let you handle the merge conflicts (or ask Krzysztof to resend
on top of my patches).

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/18/591
 
Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America