From: sudeep.holla@arm•com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Versatile Express randomly fails to boot - Versatile Express to be removed from nightly testing
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:44:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5760346A.10903@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614155220.GB1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
On 14/06/16 16:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 04:31:25PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> Using "arm,tag-latency = <2 2 1>" as Russell seemed to indicate [2]
>> fixed things for him, also works for me. So should we update mainline
>> device-tree with that?
>
> I've proposed that several times, and there seems to be no desire to
> do so.
Sorry for missing that. IIRC, we didn't conclude as <2 2 1> did fail
on continuous reboot test over night on my setup. As I mentioned early
we can change to this new value if people are able to use it reliably.
> For me, VE CT9x4 no longer boots in my nightly builds, and
> my plan at the start of the year was to take it out of both the
> nightly builds and the boot tests - no one within ARM seems to have
> any interest in the platform.
>
It's hard to get any kind of attention from hardware guys for such an
old platform.
> Having a randomly failing platform due to hardware issues is not
> productive to an automated boot test system, so I think we should
> (a) remove it from automated testing, and (b) consider deleting
> support for it from the kernel tree, as it seems there is little
> interest in debugging what's happening.
>
Even with higher latency if the platform is unusable, I agree to remove.
If you think it's usable with the updated latency(<2 2 1>) then we can
update it.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-15 21:33 Versatile Express randomly fails to boot Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 0:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 0:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 9:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 13:04 ` Versatile Express randomly fails to boot - Versatile Express to be removed from nightly testing Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 17:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-16 18:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 19:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-16 19:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-17 12:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-17 15:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-17 15:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-17 16:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-30 14:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-30 14:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-30 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-30 15:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-31 17:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-02 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-02 17:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 15:31 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-06-14 15:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-06-14 16:44 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-06-14 16:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-06-15 9:27 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-06-15 9:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-15 9:50 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-06-15 9:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-15 9:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 16:31 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5760346A.10903@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox