public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: k.kozlowski@samsung•com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: clk: Per controller locks (prepare & enable)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:23:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57737761.2020708@samsung.com> (raw)

Hi,


Problems:
1. Deadlocks on prepare lock in following scenario:
 - prepare_enable(some external clock through i2c)
   - i2c transfer
     - prepare_enable(i2c lock in SoC)
       - deadlock
See [1]. We implemented a workaround for this in few places like
10ff4c5239a1 ("i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C
clock prepared") and 34e81ad5f0b6 ("i2c: s3c2410: fix ABBA deadlock by
keeping clock prepared")

The goal would be to remove also this workaround.

2. The global prepare and enable locks are over-used. I didn't test the
congestion but intuition says that they could be improved.


Solution:
Make this locks per controller. This will directly solve problem #1
because these are different controllers. Still in-controller deadlock
could occur but we couldn't find a real case with it.


Question:
What do you think about it? I know that talk is cheap and code looks
better but before starting the work I would like to hear some
comments/opinions/ideas.


Best regards,
Krzysztof


[1]
http://www.krzk.eu/builders/boot-odroid-xu3-multi_v7/builds/34/steps/Boot%20odroid/logs/serial

             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-29  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29  7:23 Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-06-30 16:22 ` clk: Per controller locks (prepare & enable) Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-07-04  8:24   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-07-04 15:15     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-07-04 15:21       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-07-05  6:33       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-07-05 13:48         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-07-07 12:06           ` Charles Keepax
2016-07-07 12:42             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-07-07 16:00               ` Charles Keepax

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57737761.2020708@samsung.com \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox