Subject: [PATCH 7/9] remoteproc: core: Add function to over-ride current resource table

From: [email-masked] (loic pallardy)
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:47:17 +0200

Hi Lee

On 08/04/2016 11:21 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Most of the new resource table handling function are now in place, so
> it's time to put it all together.  Once new resource table information
> has been requested, the structures will be held in a holding pen until
> boot-time.  During boot-time rproc_apply_resource_overrides() will be
> invoked which in turn will pull the new information out of the holding
> pen and edit the table accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email-masked]>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 111350e..6b4e29a 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1035,6 +1035,65 @@ rproc_add_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
>   	return table;
>   }
>
> +static struct resource_table*
> +rproc_apply_resource_overrides(struct rproc *rproc,
> +			       struct resource_table **orig_table,
> +			       int *tablesz)
> +{
> +	struct rproc_request_resource *resource;
> +	struct resource_table *table = *orig_table;
> +	int size = *tablesz;
> +
> +	if (!table && size != 0) {
> +		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "No table present but table size is set\n");
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
> +
> +	rproc_dump_resource_table(rproc, table, size);
It will be good to find a way to not dump resource table if debug is not 
activated. For the same reason as you mentioned in your patch 8, 
resource table parsing will waste CPUS cycles.

> +
> +	if (!table) {
> +		size = sizeof(*table);
> +		table = devm_kzalloc(&rproc->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!table) {
> +			table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		table->ver = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(resource, &rproc->override_resources, node) {
> +		int updated = 0;
> +
> +		/* If we already have a table, update it with the new values. */
> +		updated = rproc_update_resource_table_entry(rproc, resource,
> +							    table, size);
> +		if (updated < 0) {
> +			table = ERR_PTR(updated);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		if (updated)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Didn't find matching resource entry -- creating a new one. */
> +		table = rproc_add_resource_table_entry(rproc, resource,
> +						       table, &size);
> +		if (IS_ERR(table))
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		*orig_table = table;
> +	}
> +
> +	rproc_dump_resource_table(rproc, table, size);
ditto

Regards,
Loic
> +
> +	*tablesz = size;
> +
> + out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> +	return table;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * take a firmware and boot a remote processor with it.
>    */
> @@ -1153,6 +1212,12 @@ static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>   	if (!table)
>   		goto out;
>
> +	if (!list_empty(&rproc->override_resources)) {
> +		table = rproc_apply_resource_overrides(rproc, &table, &tablesz);
> +		if (IS_ERR(table))
> +			goto out;
> +	}
> +
>   	rproc->table_csum = crc32(0, table, tablesz);
>
>   	/*
>