Subject: [PATCH v7 08/14] arm64: numa: Use pr_fmt()

From: [email-masked] (Leizhen (ThunderTown))
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 17:14:08 +0800

On 2016/8/26 20:54, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:47PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> From: Kefeng Wang <[email-masked]>
>>
>> Use pr_fmt to prefix kernel output, and remove duplicated msg
>> of NUMA turned off.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> index d97c6e2..7b73808 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>>   * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>   */
>>
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "numa: " fmt
> 
> Shouldn't this be uppercase for consistency with the existing code and
> the code in places like drivers/of/of_numa.c?
OK, I will change it to "NUMA: ".

> 
>>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>>  #include <linux/bootmem.h>
>>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
>> @@ -38,10 +40,9 @@ static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
>>  {
>>  	if (!opt)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>> -	if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3)) {
>> -		pr_info("%s\n", "NUMA turned off");
>> +	if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3))
>>  		numa_off = true;
>> -	}
>> +
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  early_param("numa", numa_parse_early_param);
>> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
>>  		set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>>
>>  	/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
>> -	pr_debug("NUMA: Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
>> +	pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> @@ -145,13 +146,13 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
>>
>>  	ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid);
>>  	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
>> +		pr_err("memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
>>  			start, (end - 1), nid);
>>  		return ret;
>>  	}
>>
>>  	node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
>> -	pr_info("NUMA: Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
>> +	pr_info("Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
>>  			start, (end - 1), nid);
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> @@ -166,19 +167,18 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn)
>>  	void *nd;
>>  	int tnid;
>>
>> -	pr_info("NUMA: Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>> -			nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
>> -			(end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
>> +	pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>> +		nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, (end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
>>
>>  	nd_pa = memblock_alloc_try_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
>>  	nd = __va(nd_pa);
>>
>>  	/* report and initialize */
>> -	pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>> +	pr_info("  NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> 
> Why are you adding leading whitespace?
Kefeng Wang said that just in order to make the final print info looks more clear.

I will remove the leading whitespace in v8.

> 
>>  		nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
>>  	tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>>  	if (tnid != nid)
>> -		pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
>> +		pr_info("    NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
> 
> 
> Same here.
> 
>>  	node_data[nid] = nd;
>>  	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t));
>> @@ -235,8 +235,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
>>  			numa_distance[i * numa_distance_cnt + j] = i == j ?
>>  				LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
>>
>> -	pr_debug("NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n",
>> -			numa_distance_cnt);
>> +	pr_debug("Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", numa_distance_cnt);
>>
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -257,20 +256,20 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
>>  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
>>  {
>>  	if (!numa_distance) {
>> -		pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n");
>> +		pr_warn_once("Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n");
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>>
>>  	if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt ||
>>  			from < 0 || to < 0) {
>> -		pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>> +		pr_warn_once("Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>>  			    from, to, distance);
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>>
>>  	if ((u8)distance != distance ||
>>  	    (from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
>> -		pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>> +		pr_warn_once("Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>>  			     from, to, distance);
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>> @@ -297,7 +296,7 @@ static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
>>  	/* Check that valid nid is set to memblks */
>>  	for_each_memblock(memory, mblk)
>>  		if (mblk->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || mblk->nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
>> -			pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>> +			pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>>  				mblk->nid, mblk->base,
>>  				mblk->base + mblk->size - 1);
>>  			return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -368,9 +367,10 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
>>  	struct memblock_region *mblk;
>>
>>  	if (numa_off)
>> -		pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
>> -	pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
>> -	       0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
>> +		pr_warn("NUMA turned off by user\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
> 
> Why are you changing the string? What's wrong with "NUMA turned off" like
> we had before?
OK. I will keep it no change in v8.

> Will
> .