Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: dts: Add MDM9615 dtsi

From: [email-masked] (Neil Armstrong)
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:48:47 +0200

Le 26/08/2016 19:55, Stephen Boyd a ?crit :
> On 08/23, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e30bfbd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Qualcomm MDM9615";
>> +	compatible = "qcom,mdm9615";
>> +	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> +
>> +	cpus {
>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>> +		#size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +		cpu0: cpu at 0 {
>> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a5";
>> +			device_type = "cpu";
>> +			next-level-cache = <&L2>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	cpu-pmu {
>> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a5-pmu";
>> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 0x304>;
> 
> Should be 0x104? Or GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH?
Yes, and PPI also...

> 
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	clocks {
>> +		cxo_board {
>> +			compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
>> +			clock-frequency = <19200000>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	regulators {
> 
> This doesn't need to be a simple bus? so that the child devices
> probe? That's good if so.

It's correct, like the clocks node.

> 
>> +		vsdcc_fixed: vsdcc-regulator {
>> +			compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> +			regulator-name = "SDCC Power";
>> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <2700000>;
>> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <2700000>;
>> +			regulator-always-on;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	soc: soc {
> [...]
>> +		L2: l2-cache {
> 
> Missing unit address.
Done.

> 
>> +			compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
>> +			reg = <0x02040000 0x1000>;
>> +			arm,data-latency = <2 2 0>;
>> +			cache-unified;
>> +			cache-level = <2>;
>> +		};
> [..]
>> +
>> +		qcom,ssbi at 500000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,ssbi";
>> +			reg = <0x500000 0x1000>;
>> +			qcom,controller-type = "pmic-arbiter";
>> +
>> +			pmicintc: pmic at 0 {
>> +				compatible = "qcom,pm8018", "qcom,pm8921";
>> +				interrupts = <GIC_PPI 226 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> +				interrupt-controller;
>> +				#address-cells = <1>;
>> +				#size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +				pwrkey at 1c {
>> +					compatible = "qcom,pm8018-pwrkey", "qcom,pm8921-pwrkey";
>> +					reg = <0x1c>;
>> +					interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> +					interrupts = <50 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <51 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> 
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING?
Crap, I'll revert these.

> 
>> +					debounce = <15625>;
>> +					pull-up;
>> +				};
>> +
>> +				pmicmpp: mpp at 50 {
>> +					compatible = "qcom,pm8018-mpp", "qcom,ssbi-mpp";
>> +					interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> +					interrupts = <24 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <25 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <26 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <27 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <28 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <29 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> 
> These are right though.
> 
>> +					reg = <0x50>;
>> +					gpio-controller;
>> +					#gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +				};
>> +
>> +				rtc at 11d {
>> +					compatible = "qcom,pm8018-rtc", "qcom,pm8921-rtc";
>> +					interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> +					interrupts = <39 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> 
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING?
Crap, Crap, reverting...

> 
>> +					reg = <0x11d>;
>> +					allow-set-time;
>> +				};
>> +
>> +				pmicgpio: gpio at 150 {
>> +					compatible = "qcom,pm8018-gpio", "qcom,ssbi-gpio";
>> +					interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> +					interrupts = <24 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <25 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <26 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <27 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <28 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> +						     <29 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> 
> These are right though.
> 
>> +					gpio-controller;
>> +					#gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +				};
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		rpm: rpm at 108000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,rpm-mdm9615";
>> +			reg = <0x108000 0x1000>;
>> +
>> +			qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 0x8 2>;
>> +
>> +			interrupts = <0 19 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> 
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING and GIC_SPI?

Exact, will beautify these.

Thanks,
Neil