From: marc.zyngier@arm•com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] ACPI: platform: setup MSI domain for ACPI based platform device
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:45:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57D97087.5040703@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473862879-7769-6-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com>
On 14/09/16 15:21, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro•org>
>
> With the platform msi domain created, we can set up the msi domain
> for a platform device when it's probed.
>
> This patch introduces acpi_configure_msi_domain(), which retrieves
> the domain from iort and set it to platform device.
>
> As some platform devices such as an irqchip needs the msi irqdomain
> to be the interrupt parent domain, we need to get irqdomain before
> platform device is probed.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm•com>
> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation•org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google•com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm•com>
> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf•com>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro•org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> drivers/base/platform.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/msi.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 13a1905..bccd3cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
> {
> struct fwnode_handle *handle;
> int its_id;
> + enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token;
>
> if (iort_dev_find_its_id(dev, req_id, 0, &its_id))
> return NULL;
> @@ -486,7 +487,9 @@ struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
> if (!handle)
> return NULL;
>
> - return irq_find_matching_fwnode(handle, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
> + bus_token = dev_is_pci(dev) ?
> + DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI : DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI;
> + return irq_find_matching_fwnode(handle, bus_token);
> }
>
> static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> index 279e539..f6eae18 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/acpi_iort.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> -#include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> #include <linux/msi.h>
> @@ -416,3 +416,16 @@ int platform_msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>
> return err;
> }
> +
> +int acpi_configure_msi_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct irq_domain *d = NULL;
> +
> + d = iort_get_device_domain(dev, 0);
This looks completely wrong. Why RID 0? As far as I can see, 0 is not a
special value, and could be something else.
> + if (d) {
> + dev_set_msi_domain(dev, d);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
I really hate this, as the platform MSI code is intentionally free of
any firmware reference. This should live in the ACPI code.
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 6482d47..ea01a37 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> #include <linux/clk/clk-conf.h>
> #include <linux/limits.h>
> #include <linux/property.h>
> @@ -500,6 +501,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
> pdev->dev.parent = pdevinfo->parent;
> pdev->dev.fwnode = pdevinfo->fwnode;
>
> + acpi_configure_msi_domain(&pdev->dev);
It feels odd to put this in the generic code, while you could perfectly
put the call into acpi_platform.c and keep the firmware stuff away from
the generic code.
> if (pdevinfo->dma_mask) {
> /*
> * This memory isn't freed when the device is put,
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index e8c81fb..1e93a78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -308,6 +308,7 @@ int platform_msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> unsigned int nvec);
> void *platform_msi_get_host_data(struct irq_domain *domain);
> +int acpi_configure_msi_domain(struct device *dev);
> #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 14:21 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] ACPI platform MSI, interrupt producer/consumer and its example mbi-gen Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: refactor its_pmsi_prepare() Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: refactor its_pmsi_init() to prepare for ACPI Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: scan MADT to create platform msi domain Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] ACPI: platform: setup MSI domain for ACPI based platform device Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 15:45 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2016-09-15 14:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-09-15 15:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-09-19 9:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] msi: platform: make platform_msi_create_device_domain() ACPI aware Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] ACPI: irq: introduce interrupt producer Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] irqchip: mbigen: drop module owner Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] irqchip: mbigen: introduce mbigen_of_create_domain() Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] irqchip: mbigen: Add ACPI support Hanjun Guo
2016-09-15 8:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-09-19 9:28 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-09-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] irqchip: mbigen: promote mbigen init Hanjun Guo
2016-09-15 15:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-09-19 9:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-09-19 10:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-09-20 2:43 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57D97087.5040703@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox