Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Allow optional irq parent callbacks

From: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 13:59:52 +0100

On 2020-10-05 12:27, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Make the PMC driver resistent to variable depth interrupt hierarchy,
>> which we are about to introduce. The irq_chip structure is now
>> allocated statically, providing the indirection for the couple of
>> callbacks that are SoC-specific.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 65 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> index d332e5d9abac..9960f7c18431 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> @@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ struct tegra_pmc {
>>  	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
>> 
>>  	struct irq_domain *domain;
>> -	struct irq_chip irq;
> 
> Did you have any particular reason for pulling this out of the struct
> tegra_pmc and making it a global variable?

The main reason is that it really isn't per-PMC. You can do everything
with a single one that is used even if you have multiple PMCs of 
different
types (not sure that's possible with the current HW, but still).

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel