Subject: [PATCHv9 6/6] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: add iommu support for slave transfers

From: [email-masked] (Laurent Pinchart)
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:52:44 +0300

Hi Niklas,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 13:22:19 Niklas S?derlund wrote:
> Enable slave transfers to a device behind a IPMMU by mapping the slave
> addresses using the dma-mapping API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas S?derlund <[email-masked]>
> ---
> drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> index cf983a9..22a5e40 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ struct rcar_dmac_chan_slave {
>  };
> 
>  /*
> + * struct rcar_dmac_chan_map - Map of slave device phys to dma address
> + * @addr: slave dma address
> + * @dir: direction of mapping
> + * @slave: slave configuration that is mapped
> + */
> +struct rcar_dmac_chan_map {
> +	dma_addr_t addr;
> +	enum dma_data_direction dir;
> +	struct rcar_dmac_chan_slave slave;
> +};
> +
> +/*
>   * struct rcar_dmac_chan - R-Car Gen2 DMA Controller Channel
>   * @chan: base DMA channel object
>   * @iomem: channel I/O memory base
> @@ -152,6 +164,7 @@ struct rcar_dmac_chan {
> 
>  	struct rcar_dmac_chan_slave src;
>  	struct rcar_dmac_chan_slave dst;
> +	struct rcar_dmac_chan_map map;
>  	int mid_rid;
> 
>  	spinlock_t lock;
> @@ -1029,13 +1042,65 @@ rcar_dmac_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan,
> dma_addr_t dma_dest, DMA_MEM_TO_MEM, flags, false);
>  }
> 
> +static int rcar_dmac_map_slave_addr(struct dma_chan *chan,
> +				    enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
> +{
> +	struct rcar_dmac_chan *rchan = to_rcar_dmac_chan(chan);
> +	struct rcar_dmac_chan_map *map = &rchan->map;
> +	phys_addr_t dev_addr;
> +	size_t dev_size;
> +	enum dma_data_direction dev_dir;
> +
> +	if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
> +		dev_addr = rchan->src.slave_addr;
> +		dev_size = rchan->src.xfer_size;
> +		dev_dir = DMA_TO_DEVICE;

Shouldn't this be DMA_FROM_DEVICE, and DMA_TO_DEVICE below ?

> +	} else {
> +		dev_addr = rchan->dst.slave_addr;
> +		dev_size = rchan->dst.xfer_size;
> +		dev_dir = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Reuse current map if possible. */
> +	if (dev_addr == map->slave.slave_addr &&
> +	    dev_size == map->slave.xfer_size &&
> +	    dev_dir == map->dir)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Remove old mapping if present. */
> +	if (map->slave.xfer_size)
> +		dma_unmap_resource(chan->device->dev, map->addr,
> +				   map->slave.xfer_size, map->dir, 0);

Unless I'm mistaken the resource will not be unmapped when freeing channel 
resources, will it ?

> +	map->slave.xfer_size = 0;
> +
> +	/* Create new slave address map. */
> +	map->addr = dma_map_resource(chan->device->dev, dev_addr, dev_size,
> +				     dev_dir, 0);
> +
> +	if (dma_mapping_error(chan->device->dev, map->addr)) {
> +		dev_err(chan->device->dev,
> +			"chan%u: failed to map %zx@%pap", rchan->index,
> +			dev_size, &dev_addr);
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(chan->device->dev, "chan%u: map %zx@%pap to %pad dir: %s\n",
> +		rchan->index, dev_size, &dev_addr, &map->addr,
> +		dev_dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE ? "DMA_TO_DEVICE" : 
"DMA_FROM_DEVICE");
> +
> +	map->slave.slave_addr = dev_addr;
> +	map->slave.xfer_size = dev_size;
> +	map->dir = dev_dir;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
>  rcar_dmac_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>  			unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction dir,
>  			unsigned long flags, void *context)
>  {
>  	struct rcar_dmac_chan *rchan = to_rcar_dmac_chan(chan);
> -	dma_addr_t dev_addr;
> 
>  	/* Someone calling slave DMA on a generic channel? */
>  	if (rchan->mid_rid < 0 || !sg_len) {
> @@ -1045,9 +1110,10 @@ rcar_dmac_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct
> scatterlist *sgl, return NULL;
>  	}
> 
> -	dev_addr = dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM
> -		 ? rchan->src.slave_addr : rchan->dst.slave_addr;
> -	return rcar_dmac_chan_prep_sg(rchan, sgl, sg_len, dev_addr,
> +	if (rcar_dmac_map_slave_addr(chan, dir))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return rcar_dmac_chan_prep_sg(rchan, sgl, sg_len, rchan->map.addr,
>  				      dir, flags, false);
>  }
> 
> @@ -1061,7 +1127,6 @@ rcar_dmac_prep_dma_cyclic(struct dma_chan *chan,
> dma_addr_t buf_addr, struct rcar_dmac_chan *rchan =
> to_rcar_dmac_chan(chan);
>  	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc;
>  	struct scatterlist *sgl;
> -	dma_addr_t dev_addr;
>  	unsigned int sg_len;
>  	unsigned int i;
> 
> @@ -1073,6 +1138,9 @@ rcar_dmac_prep_dma_cyclic(struct dma_chan *chan,
> dma_addr_t buf_addr, return NULL;
>  	}
> 
> +	if (rcar_dmac_map_slave_addr(chan, dir))
> +		return NULL;
> +
>  	sg_len = buf_len / period_len;
>  	if (sg_len > RCAR_DMAC_MAX_SG_LEN) {
>  		dev_err(chan->device->dev,
> @@ -1100,9 +1168,7 @@ rcar_dmac_prep_dma_cyclic(struct dma_chan *chan,
> dma_addr_t buf_addr, sg_dma_len(&sgl[i]) = period_len;
>  	}
> 
> -	dev_addr = dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM
> -		 ? rchan->src.slave_addr : rchan->dst.slave_addr;
> -	desc = rcar_dmac_chan_prep_sg(rchan, sgl, sg_len, dev_addr,
> +	desc = rcar_dmac_chan_prep_sg(rchan, sgl, sg_len, rchan->map.addr,
>  				      dir, flags, true);
> 
>  	kfree(sgl);

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart