From: vishwanath.bs@ti•com (Vishwanath Sripathy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:53:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f34d798db0dcb69747e6fc722cb0cf7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1252b7ed1e3731c8b0c18e385dcdc2b@mail.gmail.com>
Kevin,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs at ti.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:29 PM
> To: Kevin Hilman
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
> support via hwmod mux
>
> Kevin,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs at ti.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:58 PM
> > To: Kevin Hilman
> > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
> > support via hwmod mux
> >
> > ---
> > > >> > Can you refresh this against Tony's 'fixes' branch and re-
> > test.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I tested this on OMAP3430/n900 and noticed that it no
> longer
> > > hit
> > > >> off
> > > >> > mode from idle.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > IOW, If I enable UART timeouts and then enable off mode, I
> > > don't
> > > >> > actually ever hit off during idle. However, if I do a
> > > >> > suspend/resume I
> > > >> > see it hits off mode, then subsequent attempts to hit off
> > > during
> > > >> > idle work.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Can you investigate this?
> > > >> OK. Let me check that.
> > > > I rebased these patches against latest Tony's fixes branch and
> > > tested it
> > > > on OMAP3430 SDP. I see that Core enters off mode in idle path
> > > after
> > > > setting UART timeout w/o having to suspend the system.
> > >
> > > OK, sounds good.
> > >
> > > Do you have a branch that I can test as well?
> > Sure. It's available at
> > git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_3.3/io_daisy_chain
> Did you get any chance to test it at your side?
> Should I post the rebased patches?
I have rebased these patch series against LO master commit id:
deee6d5359969a0ce4e2760cfd7b9f379bd5698a and same is available here [1].
I have tested these patch series along with Tero's Chain Handler +
Govind's UART Runtime series which is available at [2].
Regards
Vishwa
[1]:
git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_3.3/io_daisy_chain_rebased
[2]:
git://gitorious.org/runtime_3-0/runtime_3-0.git
for_3_3/tmp_rc4_uart_pm_intg
>
> Regards
> Vishwa
> >
> > Regards
> > Vishwa
> > >
> > > Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-13 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 17:47 [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: correct enable/disable of daisy io chain Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Move IO Daisychain function to omap3 prm file Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] ARM: OMAP4 PM: Add IO Daisychain support Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO Daisychain support via hwmod mux Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Remove IO Daisychain control from cpuidle Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Daisychain for supported chips Vishwanath BS
2011-11-08 0:58 ` [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux Kevin Hilman
2011-11-29 11:22 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-29 14:59 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-30 0:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-30 9:27 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-02 16:58 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-13 14:23 ` Vishwanath Sripathy [this message]
2011-12-13 19:31 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f34d798db0dcb69747e6fc722cb0cf7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vishwanath.bs@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox