From: jacmet@sunsite•dk (Peter Korsgaard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Samsung S3C6410 mainline merge coordination
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:49:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873a75pl4z.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090902031719.GK3838@prithivi.gnumonks.org> (Harald Welte's message of "Wed\, 2 Sep 2009 12\:17\:19 +0900")
>>>>> "Harald" == Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks•org> writes:
Hi,
Harald> === NAND ===
Harald> * mainline currently uses same driver for s3c24xx and s3c64xx
Harald> ** samsung uses a new driver for 2450, 6400, 6410 (and later)
Harald> * does it make sense to extend the mainline driver with new SoC support
Harald> or should we rather split the mainline driver?
The nand controllers in the different variants are afaik very similar,
that's why I added 64xx support to s3c2410.c. What would a split gain
us?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-02 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-02 3:17 Samsung S3C6410 mainline merge coordination Harald Welte
2009-09-02 9:51 ` Nelson Castillo
2009-09-02 12:15 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-02 15:58 ` Nelson Castillo
2009-09-02 10:05 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-02 12:11 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-02 13:44 ` jassi brar
2009-09-02 14:47 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-03 0:38 ` jassi brar
2009-09-03 12:14 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-03 13:39 ` jassi brar
2009-09-03 15:18 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-04 1:08 ` jassi brar
2009-09-04 13:41 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-04 14:27 ` jassi brar
2009-09-04 14:57 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-04 1:27 ` Samsung SoC ASOC drivers Harald Welte
2009-09-04 4:10 ` jassi brar
2009-09-02 19:09 ` Samsung S3C6410 mainline merge coordination Ben Dooks
2009-09-03 0:21 ` Joonyoung Shim
2009-09-03 11:06 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-03 12:48 ` Joonyoung Shim
2009-09-02 13:45 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-02 19:22 ` Ben Dooks
[not found] ` <19987914.1168001251884594226.JavaMail.coremail@bj126app54.126.com>
2009-09-02 12:01 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-02 19:10 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-02 22:26 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-03 9:51 ` Daniel Silverstone
2009-09-03 10:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-03 10:40 ` Daniel Silverstone
2009-09-04 5:48 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-02 12:03 ` David F. Carlson
2009-09-02 12:46 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-09-02 19:16 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-03 1:56 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-03 10:04 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-09-03 10:57 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <7641737.122161251944382753.JavaMail.coremail@bj126app17.126.com>
2009-09-03 4:31 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-10 5:49 ` Samsung S3C6410 / SmartQ / 2D acceleration / Xorg Harald Welte
2009-09-15 23:34 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-15 9:49 ` Samsung S3C6410 / SmartQ / 2D acceleration / Xorgy David F. Carlson
2009-09-02 12:49 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2009-09-02 22:30 ` Samsung S3C6410 mainline merge coordination Harald Welte
2009-09-02 16:12 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-02 21:25 ` David F. Carlson
2009-09-02 23:18 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-03 3:31 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-09-03 3:38 ` Nelson Castillo
2009-09-03 4:33 ` Harald Welte
2009-09-04 7:15 ` Nelson Castillo
2009-09-02 16:58 ` Mark Brown
[not found] <23992600.419641251935757361.JavaMail.weblogic@epml11>
2009-09-03 0:46 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=873a75pl4z.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@sunsite$(echo .)dk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox