From: arno@natisbad•org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [BUG,REGRESSION] SATA regression on 12.0-rc4 kernel
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:40:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761t6bzwl.fsf@natisbad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADLC3L3EYU0VSfLMYjo013jSTWm4yZw24y+4HdvOOoEkOc6uhQ@mail.gmail.com> (Robert Hancock's message of "Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:50:33 -0600")
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail•com> writes:
>> With two different disks (same model though, i.e. 250GB 3.5" WD blue), it
>> consistently works on a 3.11.4 and consistently fails on 3.12-rc3 and
>> 3.12-rc4 (not tested others 3.12-rc). The problem is easy to reproduce,
>> i.e. I just need to perform some disk operations. With the two commits
>> reverted from 3.12-rc4, I can consistently do a "find / -exec sha256sum
>> '{}' \;" w/o anything happening.
>>
>> What I do not understand is why the log report failed FPDMA commands if
>> the feature is supposed to be SSD-related (looking only at commit
>> messages: 87fb6c31b9 seems SSD-related, ed36911c74 does not). Is it
>> possible that the feature detection is what is causing the issue? Or
>> that the hardware report support w/o having? I can test with a different
>> disk if you think it would help.
>
> The commands that are failing are WRITE FPDMA QUEUED which is a
> regular NCQ write command. The ones that these commits add support for
> are FPDMA_SEND and FPDMA_RECV which are used for NCQ trim commands.
>
> It's possible that the feature detection for this is picking up
> support for FPDMA SEND/RECV on this drive when it shouldn't be. Can
> you post the output of "hdparm --Istdout /dev/sdX" for one of these
> drives (where X matches the drive in question)?
Will do that tonight and post the output.
a+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-09 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-06 21:38 [BUG,REGRESSION] ARM: mvebu: SATA regression w/ 12.0-rc4 kernel Arnaud Ebalard
2013-10-07 12:59 ` Jason Cooper
[not found] ` <87bo303nfe.fsf@natisbad.org>
2013-10-08 2:38 ` [BUG,REGRESSION] SATA regression on " Robert Hancock
2013-10-08 6:10 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-10-09 5:50 ` Robert Hancock
2013-10-09 8:40 ` Arnaud Ebalard [this message]
2013-10-09 15:22 ` Marc (Marc-Angelo) Carino
2013-10-09 18:56 ` Arnaud Ebalard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8761t6bzwl.fsf@natisbad.org \
--to=arno@natisbad$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox