public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khilman@ti•com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] omap2+: Remove gptimer_wakeup for now
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:30:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hb7bdypb.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627080804.GG23145@atomide.com> (Tony Lindgren's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2011 01:08:05 -0700")

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide•com> writes:

> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti•com> [110623 08:09]:
>> On 6/23/2011 8:35 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide•com>  writes:
>> >
>> >So now, the only thing OMAP-specific is the debugfs file used to trigger
>> >it.
>> >
>> >>Maybe Kevin can just carry it along in the PM branch for now?
>> >
>> >I'd prefer to keep it in mainline as this is a very important feature
>> >for the PM functionality already in mainline.
>> >
>> I agree with Kevin and that's what have been saying from begining when
>> we decided to drop this feature. The new patch from Kevin is already
>> doing this in more generic way than that was before.
>
> To me Kevin's later patch makes more sense, but still has few issues:
>
> - It keeps the dependency between PM debug code and sys_timer code.
>   That's yet another artificial blocker for making PM code a loadable
>   module. We really don't want to export anything from the sys_timer code.
>
> - The interface for programming a wake-up timer should be Linux generic,
>   not omap specific.
>
> Further, it's a CONFIG_PM_DEBUG patch. So that code should not be
> in the mainline kernel.

Huh?  

Please clarify why PM debug code shouldn't be in mainline?

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20  9:23 [PATCH 00/10] init_early cleanup for omap init_irq and init_timer Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to avoid cpu_is_omap tests early Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:54   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 17:08   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 02/10] omap: Set separate timer init functions to avoid cpu_is_omap tests Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 03/10] omap: Move dmtimer defines to dmtimer.h Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:56   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:17     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 04/10] omap: Make a subset of dmtimer functions into inline functions Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 05/10] omap2+: Use dmtimer macros for clockevent Tony Lindgren
2011-06-23 17:07   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-27  7:39     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 06/10] omap2+: Remove gptimer_wakeup for now Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:39   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:48     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-23 15:05       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-23 15:13         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-27  8:08           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 16:30             ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-06-27 18:16               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 17:32   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-27 19:19     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 21:16       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 07/10] omap2+: Reserve clocksource and timesource and initialize dmtimer later Tony Lindgren
2011-06-23 17:01   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-27  7:48     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 16:41       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-23 17:13   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-27  7:51     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 10:44       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 08/10] omap2+: Use dmtimer macros for clocksource Tony Lindgren
2011-06-23 15:28   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-23 16:47     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-23 17:10   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-27  7:54     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 10:48       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 16:41         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 09/10] omap2+: Remove omap2_gp_clockevent_set_gptimer Tony Lindgren
2011-06-20  9:23 ` [PATCH 10/10] omap2+: Rename timer-gp.c into timer.c to combine timer init functions Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87hb7bdypb.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox