Subject: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE

From: [email-masked] (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:37:28 -0700

Kevin Hilman <[email-masked]> writes:

> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section
>> mapping pre-requisite instead of intended MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED
>>
>> Since the section mapping limitation gets fixed with first
>> patch in this series, the MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED can be used now.
>>
>> Have not tested this, so somebody with Davinci hardware can
>> try this out
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email-masked]>
>> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email-masked]>
>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <[email-masked]>

Also, FYI... while not a very thorough test, I boot-tested this series
on DaVinci (dm355, omapl138) and it worked fine.

I'll include in davinci git (in the davinci-testing branch) so it gets a
bit more testing.

Kevin