From: khilman@ti•com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix I/O wakeup and I/O chain clock control detection
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:46:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ipo1n0ob.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110061525240.4611@utopia.booyaka.com> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:25:52 -0600 (MDT)")
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan•com> writes:
> The way that we detect which OMAP3 chips support I/O wakeup and
> software I/O chain clock control is broken.
>
> Currently, I/O wakeup is marked as present for all OMAP3 SoCs other
> than the AM3505/3517. The TI81xx family of SoCs are at present
> considered to be OMAP3 SoCs, but don't support I/O wakeup. To resolve
> this, convert the existing blacklist approach to an explicit,
> whitelist support, in which only SoCs which are known to support I/O
> wakeup are listed. (At present, this only includes OMAP34xx,
> OMAP3503, OMAP3515, OMAP3525, OMAP3530, and OMAP36xx.)
>
> Also, the current code incorrectly detects the presence of a
> software-controllable I/O chain clock on several chips that don't
> support it. This results in writes to reserved bitfields, unnecessary
> delays, and console messages on kernels running on those chips:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg58735.html
>
> Convert this test to a feature test with a chip-by-chip whitelist.
>
> Thanks to Dave Hylands <dhylands@gmail•com> for reporting this problem
> and doing some testing to help isolate the cause. Thanks to Steve
> Sakoman <sakoman@gmail•com> for catching a bug in the first version of
> this patch.
Based on the comments from Russell, I made a couple minor changes.
Here's the updated version (also in my for_3.1/pm-fixes-3 branch.)
Other than that, it looks like a good cleanup, queueing for v3.2 and
will submit to stable as well.
Tony, do you think we can still queue this as a fix for v3.1?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-06 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-06 19:11 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix I/O wakeup and I/O chain clock control detection Paul Walmsley
2011-10-06 19:42 ` Steve Sakoman
2011-10-06 19:46 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-10-06 19:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Walmsley
2011-10-06 21:22 ` Steve Sakoman
2011-10-06 21:25 ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Walmsley
2011-10-06 23:46 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-10-06 22:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-06 23:07 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-10-06 23:18 ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Walmsley
2011-10-07 20:40 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ipo1n0ob.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox