public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission•com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] signal: Stop special casing TRAP_FIXME and FPE_FIXME in siginfo_layout
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 10:59:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87muy48nqq.fsf_-_@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87604sa2fu.fsf_-_@xmission.com> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Sun, 15 Apr 2018 10:56:21 -0500")


After more experience with the cases where no one the si_code of 0 is
used both as a signal specific si_code, and as SI_USER it appears that
no one cares about the signal specific si_code case and the good
solution is to just fix the architectures by using a different si_code.

In none of the conversations has anyone even suggested that anything
depends on the signal specific redefinition of SI_USER.

There are at least test cases that care when si_code as 0 does not work
as si_user.

So make things simple and keep the generic code from introducing
problems by removing the special casing of TRAP_FIXME and FPE_FIXME.
This will ensure the generic case of sending a signal with kill will
always set SI_USER and work.

The architecture specific, and signal specific overloads that set
si_code to 0 will now have problems with signalfd and the 32bit compat
versions of siginfo copying.  At least until they are fixed.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission•com>
---
 kernel/signal.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index d56f4d496c89..fc82d2c0918f 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2835,15 +2835,6 @@ enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(int sig, int si_code)
 			layout = SIL_POLL;
 		else if (si_code < 0)
 			layout = SIL_RT;
-		/* Tests to support buggy kernel ABIs */
-#ifdef TRAP_FIXME
-		if ((sig == SIGTRAP) && (si_code == TRAP_FIXME))
-			layout = SIL_FAULT;
-#endif
-#ifdef FPE_FIXME
-		if ((sig == SIGFPE) && (si_code == FPE_FIXME))
-			layout = SIL_FAULT;
-#endif
 	}
 	return layout;
 }
-- 
2.14.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-15 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180409152253.GD10489@altlinux.org>
2018-04-12  1:34 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12  1:45   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12  9:58   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 11:03     ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 12:19       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 12:49         ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 13:14           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 16:50             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 17:20               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 17:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13  9:42                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 16:33                     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 17:08                       ` Dave Martin
2018-04-13 17:54                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 18:23                           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 18:45                             ` Dave Martin
2018-04-13 19:53                               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-15 13:12                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-15 15:22                                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:56                                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Dealing with the aliases of SI_USER Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:57                                     ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] signal: Ensure every siginfo we send has all bits initialized Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-17 13:23                                       ` Dave Martin
2018-04-17 19:37                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 12:47                                           ` Dave Martin
2018-04-18 14:22                                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-19  8:26                                               ` Dave Martin
2018-04-15 15:58                                     ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] signal: Reduce copy_siginfo_to_user to just copy_to_user Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:59                                     ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-04-15 18:16                                     ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Dealing with the aliases of SI_USER Linus Torvalds
2018-04-16  2:03                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 17:58                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-19  9:28                                       ` Dave Martin
2018-04-19 14:40                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-13 18:35                           ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:50                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 18:56                               ` Dave Martin
2018-04-12 17:35               ` Dmitry V. Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87muy48nqq.fsf_-_@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox