public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alex.bennee@linaro•org (Alex Bennée)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] KVM: arm: guest debug, add stub KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG ioctl
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:03:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r3wqknrh.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141126143855.GC3245@hawk.usersys.redhat.com>


Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat•com> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:01PM +0000, Alex Benn?e wrote:
>> This commit adds a stub function to support the KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
>> ioctl. Currently any operation flag will return EINVAL. Actual
>> functionality will be added with further patches.
>
> Technically the stub is already there, and you're extending it to
> start looking at control flags, but still not doing anything yet.

Sure we do:

>>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  					struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
>>  {
>> -	return -EINVAL;
>> +	/* If it's not enabled clear all flags */
>> +	if (!(dbg->control & KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE)) {
>> +		vcpu->guest_debug = 0;
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}

That's some class non-functionality right there ;-)

>> +	vcpu->guest_debug = dbg->control;
>> +	kvm_info("%s: guest_debug is 0x%lx\n", __func__, vcpu->guest_debug);
>> +
>> +	/* Single Step */
>> +	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
>> +		kvm_info("SS requested, not yet implemented\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Software Break Points */
>> +	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP) {
>> +		kvm_info("SW BP support requested, not yet implemented\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Hardware assisted Break and Watch points */
>> +	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP) {
>> +		kvm_info("HW BP support requested, not yet implemented\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>
> I guess all the kvm_info's were useful for developing this patch series,
> but do we still need them?

They also served the very useful roll of stopping checkpatch.pl bitching
about my reluctance to remove braces from the if () { } clauses. However
I take your point. I can certainly remove the kvm_info() statements as
each bit of functionality is added while leaving this one to help when
someone is bisecting and confused.

-- 
Alex Benn?e

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-26 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-25 16:09 [PATCH 0/7] KVM Guest Debug support for arm64 Alex Bennée
2014-11-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: add commentary for kvm_debug_exit_arch struct Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 14:20   ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-25 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: arm: guest debug, define API headers Alex Bennée
2014-11-25 16:19   ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-26 15:04     ` Alex Bennée
2014-11-29 16:20       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-12-01 11:30         ` Alex Bennée
2014-11-25 17:05   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-25 17:13     ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-25 17:22       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-26 13:13         ` Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 13:14           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-26 14:31   ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-26 14:58     ` Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 16:46       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-26 17:47         ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-29 16:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-25 16:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: arm: guest debug, add stub KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG ioctl Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 14:38   ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-26 15:03     ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2014-11-26 16:46       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-29 16:21   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-25 16:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm64: guest debug, add SW break point support Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 16:07   ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-26 17:14     ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-29 16:21     ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-29 16:21   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-12-01 11:33     ` Alex Bennée
2014-11-25 16:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: arm64: guest debug, add support for single-step Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 16:40   ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-26 18:00     ` Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 19:27   ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-30 10:10     ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-30 10:20       ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-30 10:21   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-12-01 11:50     ` Alex Bennée
2014-12-02 13:17       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-25 16:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: arm64: re-factor hyp.S debug register code Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 16:49   ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-30 10:25   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-12-01 11:52     ` Alex Bennée
2014-12-02 13:23       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-25 16:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support Alex Bennée
2014-11-26 17:34   ` Andrew Jones
2014-11-30 10:34   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-12-01 11:54     ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r3wqknrh.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox