public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robert.jarzmik@free•fr (Robert Jarzmik)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PXA: Fix wakealarm capability for pxa-rtc
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:32:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vd7uxh5s.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008011738.16225.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (Marek Vasut's message of "Sun\, 1 Aug 2010 17\:38\:16 +0200")

Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail•com> writes:

>> Okay, I understand better, you're looking for the class driver wakup sysfs
>> entry, and not the driver sysfs wakeup entry.
>> 
>> So when you said "It's not created for me without this patch", you meant
>> the class driver's sysfs entry, not the one I mentioned I presume ?
>
> You're still talking about some "wakeup", I'm talking about 
> /sys/devices/platform/pxa-rtc/power/wakealarm .
...

>> 
>> Anyway, to straighten things up :
>>  - for an rtc driver, device_init_wakeup() has to be called before
>>  rtc_driver_register()
>>  - if that's not the case, /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm won't be created
>>  - if that's the case, if the driver called device_init_wakeup(x, 1), the
>> rtc registering will override the value with device_init_wakeup(x, 0)
>
> Are we talking about the same kernel? I just can't find this 
> "device_init_wakeup(x, 0);" which would override anything anywhere.
I already provided the call tree.

Anyway, I won't be available for the next days, and as I don't want to argue
anymore, and I expect you have tested your patch against a suspended device to
see it wake up, have my:

Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free•fr>

--
Robert

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-01 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-31  4:22 [PATCH] PXA: Fix wakealarm capability for pxa-rtc Marek Vasut
2010-07-31 15:38 ` Robert Jarzmik
2010-07-31 20:15   ` Marek Vasut
2010-07-31 21:07     ` Robert Jarzmik
2010-08-01  0:13       ` Marek Vasut
2010-08-01  0:48         ` Robert Jarzmik
2010-08-01  0:53           ` Marek Vasut
2010-08-01 11:15             ` Robert Jarzmik
2010-08-01 15:38               ` Marek Vasut
2010-08-01 19:32                 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2010-08-03  0:03                 ` Alessandro Zummo
2010-08-03  3:10                   ` Marek Vasut
2010-08-06 19:59                     ` Alessandro Zummo
2010-08-06 21:39                       ` Marek Vasut
2010-08-07  9:43                       ` Robert Jarzmik
2010-08-18  4:08                         ` Eric Miao
2010-08-18  5:04                           ` Marek Vasut
2010-08-18  6:15                             ` Eric Miao
2010-08-01  8:42 ` Igor Grinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vd7uxh5s.fsf@free.fr \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox