From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel•org>
To: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@foss•st.com>
Cc: "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman•stormreply.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org>,
linux-phy@lists•infradead.org,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti•com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel•org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss•st.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail•com>,
devicetree@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: add optional phy tuning properties
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:16:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWhz/AsfDX24iUR3@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a07f03d-ffaa-77f6-c223-74bae60eb3f1@foss.st.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:58:21PM +0200, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
>
>
> On 10/6/21 2:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Disable child nodes while parent node is already disabled fixes the
> > > warning. But it means to add status = "okay"; in child nodes everywhere
> > > usbphyc is enabled.
> > Presumably, you already have to add phy-supply everywhere.
> > >> Is it normal dtbs_check checks in child nodes when parent node is
> disabled?
> > I'll look into doing that.
>
> Should I wait for your potential dtbs_check update or should I disable child
> nodes in .dtsi (and enable them along with parent node in .dts using
> usbphyc) ?
I pushed a fix to dt-validate for this.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 15:24 [PATCH v2 0/3] phy: stm32: add phy tuning support Amelie Delaunay
2021-10-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: stm32: restore utmi switch on resume Amelie Delaunay
2021-10-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: add optional phy tuning properties Amelie Delaunay
2021-10-05 22:45 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-06 6:51 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2021-10-06 12:38 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-06 12:58 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2021-10-14 18:16 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-10-15 9:10 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2021-10-14 17:26 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] phy: stm32: add phy tuning support Amelie Delaunay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWhz/AsfDX24iUR3@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss$(echo .)st.com \
--cc=amelie.delaunay@foss$(echo .)st.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman$(echo .)stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox