Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] perf: tests: Adapt mmap-basic.c for riscv

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 11:31:36 -0300

Em Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:00:12PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti escreveu:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 3:53 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Em Wed, May 31, 2023 at 05:15:15PM +0200, Andrew Jones escreveu:
> > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:53:21AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > > riscv now supports mmaping hardware counters to userspace so adapt the
> > test
> > > > to run on this architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email-masked]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c
> > b/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c
> > > > index e68ca6229756..f5075ca774f8 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c
> > > > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct test_case tests__basic_mmap[] = {
> > > >                      "permissions"),
> > > >     TEST_CASE_REASON("User space counter reading of instructions",
> > > >                      mmap_user_read_instr,
> > > > -#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > > > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > || __riscv_xlen == 64
> > > >                      "permissions"
> > > >  #else
> > > >                      "unsupported"
> > > > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static struct test_case tests__basic_mmap[] = {
> > > >             ),
> > > >     TEST_CASE_REASON("User space counter reading of cycles",
> > > >                      mmap_user_read_cycles,
> > > > -#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > > > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > || __riscv_xlen == 64
> > > >                      "permissions"
> > > >  #else
> > > >                      "unsupported"
> > > > --
> > > > 2.37.2
> > > >
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email-masked]>
> >
> > Was the kernel part merged upstream?
> >
> 
> No, I still haven't answered the reviews :)

Ok, I'll then wait for it to happen to consider merging the userland
parts,

Thanks,

- Arnaldo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel