Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow default substream bypass with a pasid support

From: Jason Gunthorpe <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:43:25 -0300

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 04:39:48PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:

> > I'd try keeping most of the parts intact while adding a pointer
> > to a structure holding pagetable stuff, to make it cleaner. Then
> > the S1DSS bypass case can be flagged by an empty pointer.
> 
> I'd expect that what you need for this is much the same as what Michael has
> already proposed for the PASID-generalisation series. The current inside-out
> notion of S1 domains owning CD tables is what's getting in the way of doing
> the right thing cleanly, in both cases.

Yeah, that was sort of my guessed feeling as well..

What do you think of Michael's series?

Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel