public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel•org>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel•org>
Cc: bpf@vger•kernel.org, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux•dev>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel•org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel•org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux•dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail•com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail•com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel•org>, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud•com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:42:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahhGRE1efWfKsvZW@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427234801.2104511-2-puranjay@kernel.org>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 04:47:58PM -0700, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> Move the BPF return value register from x7 to x8, freeing x7 for use
> as an argument register. AAPCS64 designates x8 as the indirect result
> location register; it is caller-saved and not used for argument
> passing, making it a suitable home for BPF_REG_0.
> 
> This is a prerequisite for stack argument support, which needs x5-x7
> to pass arguments 6-8 to native kfuncs following the AAPCS64 calling
> convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux•dev>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel•org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                          |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_timed_may_goto.S                    |  8 ++++----
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_jit_inline.c  |  2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c      |  6 +++---
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c       | 10 +++++-----
>  5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Makes sense to me:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel•org>

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-27 23:47 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf, arm64: Support stack arguments Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-27 23:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7 Puranjay Mohan
2026-05-28 13:42   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-04-27 23:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments Puranjay Mohan
2026-05-28 13:43   ` Will Deacon
2026-05-28 14:23     ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-05-29 13:36       ` Will Deacon
2026-04-27 23:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Puranjay Mohan
2026-05-28 13:42   ` Will Deacon
2026-05-28 14:29     ` Puranjay Mohan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ahhGRE1efWfKsvZW@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ast@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bpf@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=song@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud$(echo .)com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux$(echo .)dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox