public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse•de>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux•dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
	david@kernel•org,  willy@infradead•org, ryan.roberts@arm•com,
	linux-mm@kvack•org, r@hev•cc, jack@suse•cz,
	 Andrew Donnellan <andrew+kernel@donnellan•id.au>,
	apopple@nvidia•com, baohua@kernel•org,
	 baolin.wang@linux•alibaba.com, brauner@kernel•org,
	catalin.marinas@arm•com, dev.jain@arm•com,  kees@kernel•org,
	kevin.brodsky@arm•com, lance.yang@linux•dev,
	 "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead•org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	 linux-fsdevel@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	ljs@kernel•org, mhocko@suse•com,  npache@redhat•com,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen•com, rmclure@linux•ibm.com,
	 rppt@kernel•org, surenb@google•com, vbabka@kernel•org,
	 Al Viro <viro@zeniv•linux.org.uk>,
	ziy@nvidia•com, hannes@cmpxchg•org, kas@kernel•org,
	 shakeel.butt@linux•dev, kernel-team@meta•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mm: use mapping_max_folio_order() for force_thp_readahead order
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 20:33:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiHSt1uK3ESOU-2O@pedro-suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601102205.3985788-3-usama.arif@linux.dev>

On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 03:21:18AM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
> The force_thp_readahead path in do_sync_mmap_readahead() is gated on
> HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER and always requests
> HPAGE_PMD_ORDER / HPAGE_PMD_NR. On configurations where HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
> exceeds MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER, notably arm64 with a 64K base page size,
> VM_HUGEPAGE mappings cannot use this path and fall back to the non-forced
> mmap readahead path even when the mapping supports useful large folios.
> 
> Enable forced readahead for mappings that support large folios and request
> the max folio order supported by the mapping, capped at 2M.
> 2MB is chosen as the cap because it matches the PMD size on x86_64
> and on arm64 with 4K base pages, so the size/memory-pressure tradeoff
> for folios of that size is already well understood. On arm64 with 16K
> and 64K base page sizes, 2MB is also the contiguous-PTE (contpte)
> block size, so the resulting folios coalesce into a single TLB entry
> and reduce TLB pressure on the readahead path. This will result
> in 32M folios not being faulted in with 16K base page size for arm64,
> but with contpte, the performance difference should be negligible.
> 
> The final allocation order may still be clamped by page_cache_ra_order()
> to the mapping and request geometry, but this gives VM_HUGEPAGE mappings
> on such configurations a large-folio readahead request instead of
> dropping back to base-page readahead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux•dev>

Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse•de>

Overall LGTM. Lets see if performance doesn't degrade.

/me hides in cover

-- 
Pedro


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 10:21 [PATCH v7 0/2] mm: improve large folio readahead for exec memory Usama Arif
2026-06-01 10:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] mm: bypass mmap_miss heuristic for VM_EXEC readahead Usama Arif
2026-06-02  3:51   ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-06-04 19:30   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-01 10:21 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mm: use mapping_max_folio_order() for force_thp_readahead order Usama Arif
2026-06-01 16:22   ` Jan Kara
2026-06-04 19:33   ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-06-01 23:10 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] mm: improve large folio readahead for exec memory Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aiHSt1uK3ESOU-2O@pedro-suse \
    --to=pfalcato@suse$(echo .)de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=andrew+kernel@donnellan$(echo .)id.au \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia$(echo .)com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux$(echo .)alibaba.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=david@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=jack@suse$(echo .)cz \
    --cc=kas@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kees@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse$(echo .)com \
    --cc=npache@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen$(echo .)com \
    --cc=r@hev$(echo .)cc \
    --cc=rmclure@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=surenb@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox