Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] coresight: etm4x: Add missing API to set EL match on address filters

From: Suzuki K Poulose <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:31:45 +0100

Hi Mike,

On 29/08/2019 22:33, Mike Leach wrote:
> TRCACATRn registers have match bits for secure and non-secure exception
> levels which are not accessible by the sysfs API.
> This adds a new sysfs parameter to enable this - addr_exlevel_s_ns.
> 

Looks good to me. Some minor nits below.

> Signed-off-by: Mike Leach <[email-masked]>
> ---
>   .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c         | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> index cc8156318018..b520f3c1521f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> @@ -1233,6 +1233,47 @@ static ssize_t addr_context_store(struct device *dev,
>   }
>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(addr_context);
>   
> +static ssize_t addr_exlevel_s_ns_show(struct device *dev,
> +				      struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				      char *buf)
> +{
> +	u8 idx;
> +	unsigned long val;
> +	struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> +	struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> +	idx = config->addr_idx;
> +	val = BMVAL(config->addr_acc[idx], 14, 8);
> +	spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> +	return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%#lx\n", val);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t addr_exlevel_s_ns_store(struct device *dev,
> +				       struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				       const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> +	u8 idx;
> +	unsigned long val;
> +	struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> +	struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config;
> +
> +	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
> +		return -EINVAL;

Can this be 0 instead of 16 to accept any base ?

> +
> +	if (val & ~0x7F)

minor nit: Do we need to use (GENMASK(14, 8) >> 8)  here instead of
hard coding the mask ?

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> +	idx = config->addr_idx;
> +	/* clear Exlevel_ns & Exlevel_s bits[14:12, 11:8] */

It may be worth adding a comment that bit[15] is RES0.

> +	config->addr_acc[idx] &= ~(GENMASK(14, 8));
> +	config->addr_acc[idx] |= (val << 8);
> +	spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> +	return size;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(addr_exlevel_s_ns);
> +
>   static ssize_t seq_idx_show(struct device *dev,
>   			    struct device_attribute *attr,
>   			    char *buf)
> @@ -2038,6 +2079,7 @@ static struct attribute *coresight_etmv4_attrs[] = {
>   	&dev_attr_addr_stop.attr,
>   	&dev_attr_addr_ctxtype.attr,
>   	&dev_attr_addr_context.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_addr_exlevel_s_ns.attr,
>   	&dev_attr_seq_idx.attr,
>   	&dev_attr_seq_state.attr,
>   	&dev_attr_seq_event.attr,

Either ways, irrespective of the above comments :

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <[email-masked]>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel