From: okaya@codeaurora•org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:01:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf80d0a4-c59d-23ff-081a-cf66feea3563@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161021024111.GA24336@localhost>
On 10/20/2016 7:41 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:01:04PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 10/19/2016 3:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>>> - Maintain a mapping of (IRQ, penalty). Initially all penalties are
>>> zero. This is for *all* IRQs, not just ISA ones. This could be a
>>> linked list, but the structure is not important as long as we can
>>> add things dynamically.
>>
>> Dynamic allocation doesn't work due to early calls from x86 architecture.
>> This is the reason why we iterate the link objects.
>
> Where exactly is this early penalization? That seems to be the
> biggest problem. Well, maybe the question of ACPI core parsing of
> _CRS/_PRS is a bigger structural problem, but the dynamic allocation
> thing at least seems solvable.
>
http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-21 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-15 4:31 [PATCH V3 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 4:31 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 12:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-15 16:58 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-18 13:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-18 15:20 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-18 15:32 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-19 22:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-19 23:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-21 0:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-20 20:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-20 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-20 21:25 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21 2:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 3:01 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-10-19 22:24 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 23:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24 4:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 4:31 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 13:06 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-18 14:05 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-18 15:05 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 4:31 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct SCI penalty calculation Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf80d0a4-c59d-23ff-081a-cf66feea3563@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox