Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

From: [email-masked] (David Collins)
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 17:13:00 -0700

On 05/02/2018 09:37 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> +- vdd_l26-supply
>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>> +       Usage:      optional (PM8998 only)
>> +       Value type: <phandle>
>> +       Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
>> +                   regulators for this PMIC.
> 
> One small additional nit here is that "vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply" is listed twice.

I'll remove the duplicate.

> Also on the schematics (and in the PM8998 datasheet) I have this is
> "VIN_LVS_1_2".  It seems like you should be consistent here and call
> this "vin-lvs-1-2-supply".

I was trying to keep the naming consistent within device tree binding
documentation for LVS vs LDO and SMPS (e.g. 'vdd' vs 'vin' prefix).  I
suppose that I can change this to match the hardware documentation pin
name.  I can also change '_' to '-' in the supply names if that is preferred.

Take care,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project