public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora•com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel•org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro•org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech•de>,
	Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips•com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel•org>
Cc: kernel@collabora•com, linux-phy@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists•infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	"Thomas Niederprüm" <dubito@online•de>,
	"Simon Wright" <simon@symple•nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Clock fixes and API transition cleanups
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 22:05:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0eeb794-11b9-4ba6-bee2-f6cc607d3a16@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511-hdptx-clk-fixes-v2-0-664e41379cab@collabora.com>

Hi Vinod,

On 5/11/26 9:21 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> This series provides a set of bug fixes and cleanups for the Rockchip
> Samsung HDPTX PHY driver.
> 
> The first part of the series (i.e. PATCH 1 & 2) addresses clock rate
> calculation and synchronization issues.  Specifically, it fixes edge
> cases where the PHY PLL is pre-programmed by an external component (like
> a bootloader) or when changing the color depth (bpc) while keeping the
> modeline constant.  Because the Common Clock Framework .set_rate()
> callback might not be invoked if the pixel clock remains unchanged, this
> previously led to out-of-sync states between CCF and the actual HDMI PHY
> configuration.
> 
> The second part focuses on code cleanups and modernizing the register
> access.  Now that dw_hdmi_qp driver has fully switched to using
> phy_configure(), we can drop the deprecated TMDS rate setup workarounds
> and the restrict_rate_change flag logic.  Finally, it refactors the
> driver to consistently use standard bitfield macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora•com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Collected Tested-by tags from Thomas and Simon
> - Fixed a typo in commit description of patch 1
> - Added a comment in patch 2 explaining why PLL config errors are
>   ignored for rk_hdptx_phy_consumer_get()
> - Added a missed FIELD_GET conversion for lcpll_hw.pms_sdiv in patch 6
> - Rebased onto latest phy/fixes
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260227-hdptx-clk-fixes-v1-0-f998f2762d0f@collabora.com

In case you missed my comments from last week on the Sashiko AI review findings
- in short, I don't think there is anything to worry about and the series should
be fine to apply as-is.  Please let me know if you would still prefer a new
revision.

Thanks,
Cristian


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-20 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 18:21 [PATCH v2 0/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Clock fixes and API transition cleanups Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-05-11 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Fix rate recalculation for high bpc Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-05-11 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Handle uncommitted PHY config changes Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-05-11 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Drop TMDS rate setup workaround Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-05-11 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Drop restrict_rate_change handling Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-05-11 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Simplify GRF access with FIELD_PREP_WM16() Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-05-11 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Consistently use bitfield macros Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-05-20 19:05 ` Cristian Ciocaltea [this message]
2026-06-03 10:27   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Clock fixes and API transition cleanups Cristian Ciocaltea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e0eeb794-11b9-4ba6-bee2-f6cc607d3a16@collabora.com \
    --to=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora$(echo .)com \
    --cc=algea.cao@rock-chips$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dubito@online$(echo .)de \
    --cc=heiko@sntech$(echo .)de \
    --cc=kernel@collabora$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=lumag@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=simon@symple$(echo .)nz \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox