Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a

From: Antonio Borneo <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:27 +0100

On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 15:15 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Jakub,
> 
> On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> > > All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
> > > dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
> > > 5.00a [2].
> > > 
> > > Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
> > > 
> > > Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
> > > 
> > > [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
> > > [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > Applied to net-next.
> 
> This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
> The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
> 
>   @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
> 
> The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
> flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
> 
>   @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
> 
> I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
> better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
> change for the correct variant.

Agree,
the patch get applied to the wrong place!

Antonio

> Cheers,
> Ahmad

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel