public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm•com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat•com>,
	kvm@vger•kernel.org, kvmarm@lists•linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel•org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel•org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm•com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux•dev>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm•com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei•com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm•com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm•com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm•com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google•com>,
	linux-coco@lists•linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os•amperecomputing.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia•com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google•com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel•org>,
	Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu•com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google•com>,
	WeiLin.Chang@arm•com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 06/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at init
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 11:57:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0eddd9f-dbaa-48e9-888d-2e3514395c91@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a0f6277-2b68-45db-a07f-16a177b0586d@redhat.com>

On 25/05/2026 07:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> On 5/22/26 1:49 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>> On 21/05/2026 01:39, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> On 5/13/26 11:17 PM, Steven Price wrote:
>>>> Query the RMI version number and check if it is a compatible version.
>>>> The first two feature registers are read and exposed for future code to
>>>> use.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm•com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v14:
>>>>    * This moves the basic RMI setup into the 'kernel' directory.
>>>> This is
>>>>      because RMI will be used for some features outside of KVM so
>>>> should
>>>>      be available even if KVM isn't compiled in.
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h |  3 ++
>>>>    arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile        |  2 +-
>>>>    arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c    |  1 +
>>>>    arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c           | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> +++++
>>>>    4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>    create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c
>>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..99c1ccc35c11
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2023-2025 ARM Ltd.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <asm/rmi_cmds.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +unsigned long rmm_feat_reg0;
>>>> +unsigned long rmm_feat_reg1;
>>>> +
>>>> +static int rmi_check_version(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct arm_smccc_res res;
>>>> +    unsigned short version_major, version_minor;
>>>> +    unsigned long host_version =
>>>> RMI_ABI_VERSION(RMI_ABI_MAJOR_VERSION,
>>>> +                             RMI_ABI_MINOR_VERSION);
>>>> +    unsigned long aa64pfr0 =
>>>> read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* If RME isn't supported, then RMI can't be */
>>>> +    if (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(aa64pfr0,
>>>> ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_RME_SHIFT) == 0)
>>>> +        return -ENXIO;
>>>> +
>>>> +    arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_VERSION, host_version, &res);
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (res.a0 == SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED)
>>>> +        return -ENXIO;
>>>> +
>>>> +    version_major = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MAJOR(res.a1);
>>>> +    version_minor = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MINOR(res.a1);
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (res.a0 != RMI_SUCCESS) {
>>>> +        unsigned short high_version_major, high_version_minor;
>>>> +
>>>> +        high_version_major = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MAJOR(res.a2);
>>>> +        high_version_minor = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MINOR(res.a2);
>>>> +
>>>> +        pr_err("Unsupported RMI ABI (v%d.%d - v%d.%d) we want v%d.
>>>> %d\n",
>>>> +               version_major, version_minor,
>>>> +               high_version_major, high_version_minor,
>>>> +               RMI_ABI_MAJOR_VERSION,
>>>> +               RMI_ABI_MINOR_VERSION);
>>>> +        return -ENXIO;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    pr_info("RMI ABI version %d.%d\n", version_major, version_minor);
>>>> +
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int __init arm64_init_rmi(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    /* Continue without realm support if we can't agree on a
>>>> version */
>>>> +    if (rmi_check_version())
>>>> +        return 0;
>>>
>>> Is this still a valid point that we have to return zero on errors
>>> returned
>>> from rmi_check_version() or other other function calls like
>>> rmi_features()?
>>> arm64_init_rmi() is triggered by subsys_initcall() where the return
>>> value
>>> needs to indicate success or failure. It's fine to return error code
>>> from
>>> arm64_init_rmi() in the path.
>>
>> Hmm, I guess now this is moved to arm64 code this indeed doesn't need
>> to. Within a module I believe an error return can fail the module
>> loading.
>>
>> I'm not sure it really makes much difference though - if this
>> initialisation fails then it's not really an error - it just means the
>> feature is unavailable.
>>
> 
> I think the return value would be consistent to the value of
> 'arm64_rmi_is_available'.
> 'arm64_rmi_is_available' is true when zero is returned, otherwise,
> 'arm64_rmi_is_available'
> is false.
> 
> With the consistency between the return value and
> 'arm64_rmi_is_available', users are
> able to know the value of 'arm64_rmi_is_available' through kernel
> parameter 'initcall_debug'.
> With the kernel parameter, the initcalls including arm64_init_rmi() are
> traced and its
> return value is outputted in the traced messages, seeing
> do_trace_initcall_start().

Fair enough, and actually refactoring this function to pass error codes
up the call stack I think does improve the look.

Thanks,
Steve

>> Thanks,
>> Steve
>>
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (WARN_ON(rmi_features(0, &rmm_feat_reg0)))
>>>> +        return 0;
>>>> +    if (WARN_ON(rmi_features(1, &rmm_feat_reg1)))
>>>> +        return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +subsys_initcall(arm64_init_rmi);
>>>
> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 13:17 [PATCH v14 00/44] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 01/44] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 02/44] kvm: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:26   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 03/44] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:15     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 04/44] arm64: RMI: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2026-05-18  7:08   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-20 16:01     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-21 15:33     ` Steven Price
2026-05-22  9:58       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-03 10:15         ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 05/44] arm64: RMI: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2026-05-19  5:35   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:21   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 06/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at init Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:39   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:49     ` Steven Price
2026-05-25  6:58       ` Gavin Shan
2026-06-03 10:57         ` Steven Price [this message]
2026-05-21 13:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-03 10:57     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 07/44] arm64: RMI: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:51   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 22:36     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-21 13:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:53     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-06-03 15:48     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 08/44] arm64: RMI: Ensure that the RMM has GPT entries for memory Steven Price
2026-05-19  5:55   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-06-03 15:48     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:58   ` Gavin Shan
2026-06-03 15:48     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 13:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:39     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-06-03 15:48       ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 09/44] arm64: RMI: Provide functions to delegate/undelegate ranges of memory Steven Price
2026-05-21 13:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 16:01     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-22 10:02       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-04 14:43     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 10/44] arm64: RMI: Add support for SRO Steven Price
2026-05-14  8:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-14  9:33     ` Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:02   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-06-04 15:19     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21  4:38   ` Gavin Shan
2026-06-04 15:19     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 14:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-04 15:19     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 11/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 12/44] arm64: RMI: Check for LPA2 support Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 13/44] arm64: RMI: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:17   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-06-04 15:27     ` Steven Price
2026-05-27 15:21   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-02 11:15     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-06-04 15:27     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 14/44] arm64: RMI: Basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:31   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-28  7:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-02 14:49     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-06-04 15:55       ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 15/44] kvm: arm64: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 16/44] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 17/44] arm64: RMI: RTT tear down Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:54   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-26 22:27   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-26 22:32   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 18/44] arm64: RMI: Activate realm on first VCPU run Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 19/44] arm64: RMI: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:39   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 20/44] arm64: RMI: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2026-05-28  4:07   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 21/44] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2026-05-28  4:11   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 22/44] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2026-05-28  4:38   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 23/44] arm64: RMI: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2026-05-19  9:40   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-27 10:52   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 24/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2026-05-28  5:03   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 25/44] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 26/44] arm64: RMI: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2026-05-28  5:30   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 27/44] arm64: RMI: Set RIPAS of initial memslots Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:02   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 10:13     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-19 12:55       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 13:06         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 28/44] arm64: RMI: Create the realm descriptor Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:47   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-28  5:51   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 29/44] arm64: RMI: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-06-05  6:23   ` Gavin Shan
2026-06-05  7:28     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 30/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 31/44] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 32/44] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2026-05-28  6:55   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 33/44] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 34/44] arm64: RMI: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 35/44] arm64: RMI: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 36/44] arm64: RMI: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 37/44] arm64: RMI: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:25   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 38/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 39/44] arm64: RMI: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 40/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 41/44] arm64: RMI: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 42/44] arm64: RMI: Provide register list for unfinalized RMI RECs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 43/44] arm64: RMI: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 44/44] arm64: RMI: Enable realms to be created Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0eddd9f-dbaa-48e9-888d-2e3514395c91@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=alpergun@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=fj0570is@fujitsu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os$(echo .)amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kvm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists$(echo .)linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists$(echo .)linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia$(echo .)com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=tabba@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=will@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox