Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

From: [email-masked] (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:33:38 -0800

David Lechner <[email-masked]> writes:

> On 11/23/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
>>> bias on groups of pins.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <[email-masked]>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
>>>  			};
>>>
>>>  		};
>>> +		pinconf: pin-controller at 22c00c {
>>> +			compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
>>> +			reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
>>> +			status = "disabled";
>>> +		};
>>
>> Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
>> nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
>> but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.
>
> I can do this, but it seems that the predominant sorting pattern here
> is to keep subsystems together (e.g. all i2c are together, all uart
> are together, etc.)
>
> Would a separate patch to sort everything by unit address to get this
> cleaned up be acceptable?

No thanks. That kind of thing is the needless churn that gets us flamed.

Kevin