Subject: [PATCH/RFCv4 3/6] mm: cma: Added SysFS support

From: [email-masked] (Michał Nazarewicz)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:20:57 +0200

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:37:08 +0200, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Whats the rationale for having those #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS sprinkled
> in the C code? Is SysFS not used on StrongARM? Why not implicitly include
> the SysFS support?

The SysFS CMA interface is meant for development only and because of that
I decided to separate it form the core in a separate patch and enable it
only when explicitly requested.

-- 
Best regards,                                        _     _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of  o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science,  Micha? "mina86" Nazarewicz       (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--