Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree

From: Kukjin Kim <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:46:30 +0900

Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:35:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>  > Hi Dave,
>  >
>  > Today's linux-next merge of the cpufreq tree got a conflict in
>  > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c between commit 7d30e8b3815f ("ARM:
>  > EXYNOS4: Add EXYNOS4 CPU initialization support") from the s5p tree and
>  > commit 44033b9c940e ([CPUFREQ] Remove the pm_message_t argument from
>  > driver suspend"") from the cpufreq tree (where this file is called
>  > arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c).
>  >
>  > Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix
as
>  > necessary.
> 
> Yep, Looks fine to me. thanks.
> 
> 	Dave

Of course, it's ok to me too.
Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email-masked]>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.