Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:17:15 -0400

On Mon, 02 May 2011 13:13:37 +0200, Michal Marek said:

> +# We test for support of the -Wunused-but-set-variable option, because
> +# some version of gcc will happily accept any -Wno-* switch and complain
> +# later during build.
> +ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn, -Wunused-but-set-variable), y)
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
> +endif

Do we need to do this more generically for all the other -Wno-foo
options under the various W={123} options?