public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
	linux-next@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:46:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234140383.26563.0.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209113855.180c03cb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 11:38 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip-core tree got a conflict in
> fs/btrfs/locking.c between commit
> b4ce94de9b4d64e8ab3cf155d13653c666e22b9b ("Btrfs: Change btree locking to
> use explicit blocking points") from Linus' tree and commit
> cf47b8f3d96b0b8b10b557444a28b3ca4024ff82 ("Btrfs: stop spinning on
> mutex_trylock and let the adaptive code spin for us") from the tip-core
> tree.
> 
> Resolved as in tip/master by taking the version from Linus' tree.

Sorry, I meant to ask Ingo to drop the patch I had sent along for the
btrfs adaptive code. Using Linus' copy was the right answer, it replaces
the patch I sent to Ingo.

-chris

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-09  0:38 linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-09  0:46 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-02-09  8:51   ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-21  1:39 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-21  3:56 ` Darren Hart
2009-05-21  9:30   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-21  9:38     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-22  0:19   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-22  5:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-22 18:18       ` Darren Hart
2009-04-06  0:36 Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-06  2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-06 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02  0:46 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1234140383.26563.0.camel@think.oraclecorp.com \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox