From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions•net>
To: "Gábor Stefanik" <netrolller.3d@gmail•com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle•com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger•kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (rfkill)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:53:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244044417.4862.23.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69e28c910906030847k7e6f97bbo16497d872b93151b@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1002 bytes --]
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 17:47 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> >> CFG80211=y
> >> MAC80211=y
> >> RFKILL=m
> >>
> >> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call':
> >> core.c:(.text+0xa678b): undefined reference to `rfkill_blocked'
> >> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_dev_free':
> >
> > Hrm. I thought
> >
> > config CFG80211
> > tristate "Improved wireless configuration API"
> > depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
> >
> > would avoid that. Why doesn't it?
> >
> > johannes
> >
>
> Maybe the "y" state of CFG80211 specifically needs to depend on
> RFKILL=y || !RFKILL.
Maybe doesn't help me at all.
> BTW should CFG80211=y really be blocked when RFKILL=m?
Yes.
> Shouldn't we
> just disable CFG80211 RFKILL support in this case (perhaps via a
> separate CONFIG_CFG80211_RFKILL automatically configured depending on
> CONFIG_RFKILL)?
That would be immensely stupid. You might as well just make cfg80211 a
module then.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-03 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-03 9:09 linux-next: Tree for June 3 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-03 15:22 ` linux-next: Tree for June 3 (rfkill) Randy Dunlap
2009-06-03 15:29 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1244042950.4862.10.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-03 15:47 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-03 15:53 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
[not found] ` <4A269539.8020607-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-03 16:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-03 17:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-06-03 17:33 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1244050400.22105.0.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-03 22:48 ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2009-06-03 15:24 ` linux-next: Tree for June 3 (staging) Randy Dunlap
2009-06-03 15:25 ` Greg KH
2009-06-03 15:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-06-03 23:11 ` Greg KH
2009-06-04 2:04 ` Gao, Yunpeng
2009-06-03 15:44 ` linux-next: Tree for June 3 (staging++) Randy Dunlap
2009-06-03 15:50 ` linux-next: Tree for June 3 (driver core) Randy Dunlap
2009-06-03 21:22 ` Greg KH
2009-06-03 21:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244044417.4862.23.camel@johannes.local \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions$(echo .)net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox