Subject: [PATCH] sched: Remove unused update_shares_locked()

From: Peter Zijlstra <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:13:39 +0100

On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 18:22 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> kernel/sched.c:1636: warning: 'update_shares_locked' defined but not used
> 
> Introduced by commit f492e12ef050e02bf0185b6b57874992591b9be1 ("sched:
> Remove load_balance_newidle()").

Hmm, you're quite right indeed, that removed the only user of that
function.

---
Subject: sched: Remove unused update_shares_locked()

Commit f492e12ef050e02bf0185b6b57874992591b9be1 ("sched: Remove
load_balance_newidle()") removed the only user of this function, so
remove it too.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email-masked]>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   14 --------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 876e7c1..b5c8b44 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1633,16 +1633,6 @@ static void update_shares(struct sched_domain *sd)
 	}
 }
 
-static void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
-{
-	if (root_task_group_empty())
-		return;
-
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-	update_shares(sd);
-	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
-}
-
 static void update_h_load(long cpu)
 {
 	if (root_task_group_empty())
@@ -1657,10 +1647,6 @@ static inline void update_shares(struct sched_domain *sd)
 {
 }
 
-static inline void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
-{
-}
-
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT