Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:54:23 +0100

On Monday, March 04, 2013 10:58:41 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/base/power/qos.c: In function '__dev_pm_qos_flags':
> drivers/base/power/qos.c:64:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/base/power/qos.c: In function 'dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy':
> drivers/base/power/qos.c:248:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ERR_PTR' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/base/power/qos.c:248:17: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
> drivers/base/power/qos.c: In function 'dev_pm_qos_add_request':
> drivers/base/power/qos.c:294:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IS_ERR' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/base/power/qos.c: At top level:
> drivers/base/power/qos.c:202:13: warning: '__dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_limit' used but never defined [enabled by default]
> drivers/base/power/qos.c:203:13: warning: '__dev_pm_qos_hide_flags' used but never defined [enabled by default]
> 
> Caused by commit 1e3b5df683e2 ("PM / QoS: Remove device PM QoS sysfs
> attributes at the right place").
> 
> I have used the pm tree from next-20130301 for today.

Thanks for the report and sorry for the breakage.  It should be fixed now.

Rafael

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.