From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99•com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic•net>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm•linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical•com>,
Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora•org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:12:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287432774.5588.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010181525000.2764@xanadu.home>
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 15:29 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Ok, well in that case why not accept this immediately after the merge
> > window? A point when everything is quiet, and most of the tree's are
> > empty?
>
> RMK has his own merge window which closes about at the same time as
> Linus' one opens. We thought this was happening last week and therefore
> this change was supposed to be the last one.
It seems like that could potentially make these kinds of problem worse,
since your merging things immediately before sending them to Linus. Like
right now we only have a fairly short amount of time to correct this
conflict.
> > Well how about I merge this change into my tree ?
>
> If you ask RMK to merge your tree in his that would be much simpler to
> add this change in a single pass afterwards.
I can do that , but would I still be able to merge stuff into my tree?
Seems like I could, Russell would just clean up the conflict and my tree
would just move forward like it has been already , and I would send the
whole thing to Linus.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-18 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-17 23:35 linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18 0:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18 8:15 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 17:26 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 18:20 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 18:46 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 19:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 20:12 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-10-18 20:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 20:37 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 20:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 21:05 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 21:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 21:35 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 21:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 20:58 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 21:29 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 21:58 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 22:27 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 22:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 22:53 ` Joe Perches
2010-10-19 13:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-19 17:03 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 17:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-19 18:42 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 18:53 ` Russell King
2010-10-19 19:24 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 18:34 ` Russell King
2010-10-19 18:49 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 23:09 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 23:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 23:45 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 2:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-19 16:55 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 20:19 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 20:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-31 6:08 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-31 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-31 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-02 18:29 ` David Brown
2011-02-02 19:43 ` Greg KH
2011-02-02 20:00 ` Russell King
2011-02-02 20:32 ` Greg KH
2011-02-02 20:44 ` Russell King
2011-02-02 21:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-02 22:46 ` David Brown
2011-02-02 22:59 ` David Brown
2011-02-03 0:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-04 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-04 17:42 ` Russell King
2011-02-04 18:02 ` David Brown
2011-02-04 18:10 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-04 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-04 20:38 ` David Brown
2010-05-04 1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-04 16:42 ` Daniel Walker
2010-05-04 21:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287432774.5588.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=dwalker@fifo99$(echo .)com \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical$(echo .)com \
--cc=johlstei@codeaurora$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic$(echo .)net \
--cc=rmk@arm$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox