From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
To: paulmck@linux•vnet.ibm.com
Cc: sedat.dilek@gmail•com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:06:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303812417.20212.239.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110424164331.GN2628@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 09:43 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Peter, any thoughts on what I might have done wrong to get the scheduler
> into a state where it was ignoring a runnable realtime task?
Not really, the only thing I can think of is something like poking at
task->state while its sleeping. One you set it to TASK_RUNNING wakeups
will be ignored since its already running ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 8:59 linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?) Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 9:16 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 10:19 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 22:19 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 22:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-21 5:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-21 9:07 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-21 10:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-21 12:49 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-21 14:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-21 14:47 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-22 0:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-22 9:40 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-22 15:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-22 17:36 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-23 21:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-23 21:16 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-23 23:04 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-23 23:08 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-24 6:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-24 9:36 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-24 16:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 5:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 11:45 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-26 12:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 12:50 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-26 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-04-26 11:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 19:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303812417.20212.239.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox