Subject: Re: [PATCH-v5 00/13] iscsi-target: initial .40-rc1 merge

From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:06:56 -0700

On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:37 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <[email-masked]>
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> Here is an updated v5 mergeable + squashable .40-rc1 series of iscsi-target
> against scsi-misc .39-rc7 target core intrastructure with (round 1) .40
> target core patches from this evening applied:
> 
> [PATCH 0/6] target: .40 bugfixes+changes (round 1)
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130586157027016&w=2
> 
> The includes the following changes from PATCH-v4:
> 
> *) Convert initial iscsi-target merge to use scsi_tcq.h
> 
> As before, please merge patch #1 + #2 as seperate libiscsi commits with
> Mike's signoff.  From there go ahead and squash #3 -> #13 using the commit
> message of patch #3 for an initial commit of drivers/target/iscsi/
> 
> This patch has been made against the latest scsi-misc HEAD:
> 
> commit 6ad11eaa8a689a27e0c99905bcf800a37cd432a0
> Author: Joe Carnuccio <[email-masked]>
> Date:   Tue May 10 11:30:16 2011 -0700
> 
>     [SCSI] qla2xxx: Refactor call to qla2xxx_read_sfp for thermal temperature.
> 
> 
> The complete series for an initial merge including (round 1) .40 changes is
> available directly here:
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/scsi-post-merge-2.6.git for-40-iscsi-target-merge-v3
> 
> 
> At this point there is one outstanding bug + patch being tested by Martin wrt
> to SessionType=Discovery logout exception handling during an iscsi-target
> failure/shutdown event.  Please expect an rc-fixes patch to address this
> specific issue after the initial merge.
> 
> Thanks folks!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <[email-masked]>
> 

Hi James,

Ping on finally getting iscsi-target merged..?

I have no further changes nor gotten any further review feedback at this
point for an initial merge for .40-rc1 (or 2.8.0-rc1) , and one
iscsi-target bugfix is currently in my queue for rc-fixes that has been
resolved recently with Martin's help.

Considering the short term window this time around, can you please have
a look at getting this merged ASAP so that it can send a few days in
linux-next..?

Thank you,

--nab