public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat•com>,
	linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ptrace tree related)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:06:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314090386.3600.2.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110823160309.112ad0f4922be8605b61c8dd@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 16:03 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> kernel/signal.c: In function 'block_sigmask':
> kernel/signal.c:2333:26: error: 'SA_NODEFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> Caused by commit 932e5a25b9cf ("signal: Add block_sigmask() for adding
> sigmask to current->blocked").  Sparc seems to use SA_NOMASK in the
> equivalent bit of code and has no SA_NODEFER definition.
> 
> I discovered this after releasing linux-next today.

Ouch, my bad. Thanks for the heads up Stephen!

Guys, how about this patch?

--------8<--------

>From 1358a0ab01b95344cd542e5139bc4865650fbf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel•com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:54:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sparc: Make SA_NOMASK a synonym of SA_NODEFER

Unlike other architectures, sparc currently has no SA_NODEFER
definition but only the older SA_NOMASK. Since SA_NOMASK is the
historical name for SA_NODEFER, add SA_NODEFER and copy what other
architectures do by making SA_NOMASK a synonym for SA_NODEFER.

Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel•com>
---
 arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
index e49b828..aa42fe3 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
@@ -143,10 +143,11 @@ struct sigstack {
 #define SA_ONSTACK	_SV_SSTACK
 #define SA_RESTART	_SV_INTR
 #define SA_ONESHOT	_SV_RESET
-#define SA_NOMASK	0x20u
+#define SA_NODEFER	0x20u
 #define SA_NOCLDWAIT    0x100u
 #define SA_SIGINFO      0x200u
 
+#define SA_NOMASK	SA_NODEFER
 
 #define SIG_BLOCK          0x01	/* for blocking signals */
 #define SIG_UNBLOCK        0x02	/* for unblocking signals */
-- 
1.7.4.4

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-23  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-23  6:03 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ptrace tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-23  9:06 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2011-08-24 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1314090386.3600.2.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=matt.fleming@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox