Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (trace/events/sunrpc.h)

From: Steven Rostedt <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:30:24 -0500

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 03:14 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:

> Hmm.... How about if we rather take that out of the RPC_DEBUG condition?
> I'm assuming that if someone compiles in the tracepoint code, then they
> want to be able to do a full trace independently of whether or not they
> set CONFIG_SYSCTL.

Works for me.

> 
> 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------
> From d051b60dcc3032b71cf8d9b96ac4bf24f12b6dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Trond Myklebust <[email-masked]>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:01:15 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Ensure that we can trace waitqueues when
>  !defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL)
> 
> The tracepoint code relies on the queue->name being defined in order to
> be able to display the name of the waitqueue on which an RPC task is
> sleeping.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <[email-masked]>

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <[email-masked]>

-- Steve

> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h |    3 +++
>  include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h |   15 +++++++++++++--
>  net/sunrpc/sched.c           |    4 +---
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>