Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7

From: Johannes Berg <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:12:54 +0200

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 17:59 +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:

> The idea behind this patch is that users setting the protocol to
> something else probably do know better and so should be left alone.

Regardless of that, I think that still the skb pointers would be changed
by this patch which would confuse the receiver of the SKB (device
driver), no? Has anyone verified that theory? :)

johannes