Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the rdma tree

From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 02:04:42 -0800

On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 16:42 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the target-updates tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c
>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   4a061b287b1e ("IB/ulps: Avoid calling ib_query_device")
>   cfeb91b375ad ("IB/iser: Convert to CQ abstraction")
>   2392a4cdcb8d ("IB/iser: constify iser_reg_ops structure")
>   422bd0acb062 ("IB/isert: Support the remote invalidation exception")
>   59caaed7a72a ("IB/iser: Support the remote invalidation exception")
> 
> from the rdma tree and commit:
> 
>   ddca7d44ccd2 ("iser: Have initiator and target to share protocol structures and definitions")
>   6d2cb3ad4bc2 ("iser-target: Support the remote invalidation exception")
>   c37c810bae45 ("IB/iser: Increment the rkey when registering and not when invalidating")
>   9a4a71456262 ("IB/iser: Support the remote invalidation exception")
> 
> from the target-updates tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (hopefully - mainly taking one of the other side (usually
> the rdma tree version, so please check the result when I release it)
> and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
> 
> Seom of these patches are very similar ...
> 

Thanks SFR.

Sagi & Or, to confirm the iser/iser-target changes currently queued in
Doug's rdma.git for-next branch means the -v2 series introducing
remote invalidation support here:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg11289.html

can now be safely dropped from target-pending/for-next, yes..?